hidden image

Action under a Scrapped Section

Adv. Jijo Thomas Placheril Adv. Jijo Thomas Placheril
19 Jul 2021

There was a landmark judgment by a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justice J Chelameswar and Justice R. F. Nariman in 2015 on Information Technology Act 2000.

The apex court scrapped Section 66A of the Act that made posting offensive comments online a crime punishable by jail.

In 2012 two girls were arrested by Mumbai police under the Act for expressing their displeasure through a Facebook post on a bandh (hartal), which was called by Shiv Sena in Mumbai at the death of Bal Thackery.

A law student named Shreya Singhal from Delhi University, by the way of public interest, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, challenging the validity of the section and claiming the Act as violative of freedom of speech and expression of an individual.

Section 66 A is a penalizing Section and the punishment extends to three years of imprisonment with fine. The Section uses terms like grossly offensive, menacing character, known to be false, causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred, ill will, deceive and mislead. 

The Supreme Court observed certain points for scrapping Section 66 A of IT Act:

1. Liberty of thought and expression as cardinal rights and the section clearly affects the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined in the Constitution. The public's right to know is directly affected by section 66 A of the Information Technology Act.  

2.  Every expression used is nebulous in meaning. What may be offensive to one may not be offensive to another. Therefore, the interpretation was held to be subjective in nature. Hence the court ordered 66 A as violative of right to freedom of speech and expression and is not covered under the grounds of reasonable restrictions given under Article 19(2). 

3. The Bench rejected the assurance given by the government during the hearing that certain procedures may be laid down to ensure that the law in question is not abused. The government had also said that it will not misuse the provision.

4. The Bench mentioned that governments come and go but section 66 A will remain forever and no government can give an undertaking about its successor that they will not abuse the same.

The court observed that the expressions used in 66 A are completely open-ended and undefined and it is not covered under Article 19(2) of Indian Constitution. Section 66 A actually had no proximate connection or link with causing disturbance to public order or with incitement to commit an offence and hence it was struck down by the court. The approach adopted by the court was to protect the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression and in no way the legislation can take away this right by claiming the shield under Article-19(2) of the Constitution.

After scrapping Section 66 A, six years have been passed. But now to the shock of the Supreme Court, reports say that more than thousand cases have been filed in the country under section 66 A of the Act. Maharashtra 381, Jharkhand 291, Uttar Pradesh 245, Rajasthan 192 are some of the figures in States where cases are registered under this Section. It is intolerable infiltration of the administration into the fundamental rights of individuals, dishonoring the order of the court.

The apex court may apply the legal principle of ignorantia juris non excusat (ignorance of the law excuses not) to those administrative bodies of the states which have taken actions on individuals on a scrapped section.  The state governments have to give compensation to those on whom they have taken cognizance for a non-existing offence. That will be the only possible way to avail justice to them.  

Recent Posts

In a world scarred by war, hatred, and inhuman leadership, education must humanise, not merely inform. Sanjeevani Vidyapeeth shows how empowering the marginalised with values, character, and competenc
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
07 Jul 2025
The sinking of MSC ELSA 3 off Kerala's coast exposes a toxic mix of corporate impunity, political complicity, and environmental neglect. As hazardous cargo threatens lives and livelihoods, the silence
apicture Joseph Maliakan
07 Jul 2025
In a world slipping into chaos, where leaders trade threats and valorise violence, India mirrors this decay, silencing dissent, weaponising identity, and pushing the marginalised to the margins. The c
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
07 Jul 2025
When Fr. Stan Swamy died on July 5, 2021, the world of truth and justice was shocked and saddened. Those who belonged to this group were convinced that his death was not a natural one, but a premedita
apicture Cedric Prakash
07 Jul 2025
The strength of India is in her democracy; the unity of India is in her diversity; the heritage of India is in her hospitality, the breath of India is in her principle of Ahimsa/non-violence, and the
apicture Fr. L. Michael Collins
07 Jul 2025
Marking June 25 as 'Samvidhan Hatya Diwas' is a calculated distortion of history, designed to vilify Indira Gandhi while deflecting from the ongoing, undeclared Emergency under Modi.
apicture G Ramachandram
07 Jul 2025
When a nation stops examining itself, it stops evolving. When a people stop questioning, they stop progressing. And when truth is replaced by lies, it takes only a few years for credibility to erode —
apicture Robert Clements
07 Jul 2025
The Emergency must be remembered, not as a tool to target a political party but as a lesson against authoritarian excess. Yet, we cannot ignore that worse violations of democratic norms and human righ
apicture A. J. Philip
30 Jun 2025
Fifty years later, India faces a chilling déjà vu with an 'undeclared' Emergency. Freedom of speech is stifled, dissent is suppressed, and institutions are compromised. True democracy demands resistan
apicture Cedric Prakash
30 Jun 2025
Amit Shah's claim that those who speak English will be ashamed evidences that the BJP-RSS is trying to bring down the populace and push India into another Vedic dark age where ignorance and superstiti
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
30 Jun 2025