hidden image

Agenda of demonizing Muslims, says Shabnam Hashmi

Anju Grover Anju Grover
14 Feb 2022
Shabnam Hashmi, Political Activist

The hijab controversy of Karnataka has gone national as several political leaders have expressed serious concern in Parliament and outside. Political analysts find a link between Uttar Pradesh elections and the hijab controversy. They allege that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is apparently trying its best to ensure Muslim votes get splintered in Western Uttar Pradesh on the back of this spiralling protest. Then there are informed Muslim voices who say that wearing a hijab is not necessarily a compulsory part of Muslim culture. They say that right-wing leaders from the Muslim community have given the matter a political and religious twist. In the midst of all, several people have gone to the courts. 
 

Anju Grover for Indian Currents spoke to political activist Shabnam Hashmi on the hijab controversy. Hashmi has condemned the issue saying that it has been blown out of proportion by those with political or religious interest. She said whether Muslim girls should or should not be allowed to wear hijab in the pre-university colleges where a uniform dress code is in place should be sorted out between the agitating Muslim girls and the management of the colleges concerned. But the manner in which it has been converted into a Hindu versus Muslim conflict by the saffron scarves clad pro-Hindutva boys taking to the streets was not acceptable, she lamented. Hashmi is against hijab as it is not an identity. The activist said that wearing hijab by choice is the result of patriarchal/feudal conditioning of Muslim girls when they are young. 

Q: Your views on hijab issue?

A: I condemn the attack on women on the hijab issue. The way they are being hounded by various sections is not acceptable. But hijab is not my identity or pride. It is problematic. A lot of women activists have different views on the issue.  For many women, it could be their choice. But these choices have been constructed over a period of time. The conditioning is done by the society in the form of choices. I am not going to stop any one from wearing ‘hijab’ but I won’t glorify it. 

Q: Is the issue related to women only? 

A: It is a complicated issue. It is part of a larger agenda of demonizing Muslims that has been going on for over two decades and especially in the last seven years. I don’t see any problem if Udupi-based girls’ college does not allow wearing hijab. It could have been sorted out at the college level if right wing people from both the sides had not jumped into it. The issue has been blown out of proportion. 

Q: Do you suspect that there is politics behind it? 

A:  The BJP has been trying to communalise Uttar Pradesh elections. The drama of firing on Asaduddin Owaisi's convoy failed to polarise the society. The party has made several attempts to communalise issues. I have heard that some women who were not wearing hijab belong to Campus Front of India. (It is noteworthy to mention here that the Campus Front of India has claimed that Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) members were the ones who supplied saffron shawls and provoked students.) People’s Front of India (PFI) has blown it out of proportion. It is a bigger conspiracy which serves the right wing and patriarchal forces. 

Q: The law says that you practice religion at home but at work place, you have to follow rules and regulations of the institution? 

A: As an activist who believes in gender equality, I am not ready to say it is fine. I am perturbed when I see three or four or five-year-old Muslim girls being wrapped up from head to foot in hijab. I don’t want children (girls) of any religion to be subjected to this kind of confinement by the feudal and patriarchal forces. Is it her choice to wear hijab when she has been conditioned to wear hijab? 

Q: Your suggestions for dealing with hijab issue? 

A: There is no magic wand to solve this problem. So, it is a big challenge for the judiciary to deal with this issue. Whichever way it goes, it will create more problems. Fundamentalists from both sides are going to gain regardless of court ruling. 

Q: How do you see the role of Karnataka government in handling this issue?

A: The Karnataka Minister’s statements are deplorable. 

Recent Posts

From collapsing public institutions and shrinking academic freedom to corruption, communal polarisation, and attacks on constitutional rights, the nation's deepest crisis is not administrative failure
apicture Cedric Prakash
20 Jul 2026
Governed by a mix of national coalitions and state-level regional forces, its massive electorate engages in vibrant, highly contested elections to balance local aspirations with national governance.
apicture Pachu Menon
20 Jul 2026
May I seek your kind permission to apply for the post of Chief Executive Officer of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra? Having gone through the eligibility conditions, I have reached the conclusi
apicture A. J. Philip
20 Jul 2026
Women's empowerment cannot coexist with political patronage that confines women to kitchens while celebrating them as voters. Anandiben Patel's remarks expose that the ruling establishment does not se
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
20 Jul 2026
Barely weeks after the BJP assumed office, West Bengal has witnessed a disturbing surge in attacks on Christians and Muslims. Majoritarian politics is fast replacing the State's long tradition of plur
apicture Fr Soroj Mullick, SDB
20 Jul 2026
The relentless assault on Rahul Gandhi has become a political industry. By echoing narratives crafted by the ruling party's propaganda machinery, influential critics have done more to weaken the democ
apicture Mathew John
20 Jul 2026
In the agricultural fields, You are the owners Of land our ancestors tilled Without ever seeing a deed.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
20 Jul 2026
Then we organise our own match, lock out the referee, remove the opposition, announce the final score and declare ourselves world champions.
apicture Robert Clements
20 Jul 2026
Courts speak through evidence, not the religion of judges or the accused. Once judicial decisions are judged by identity instead of reasoning, the blindfold of Lady Justice falls, and with it, public
apicture A. J. Philip
13 Jul 2026
Religion loses its soul when it becomes a vehicle for power and profit. The Ayodhya donation controversy exposes how faith is exploited for political capital and commercial enterprise. Democracy deman
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
13 Jul 2026