hidden image

Bob’s Banter

Robert Clements Robert Clements
28 Sep 2020

As fair play evolved and even warfare rules changed from barbaric methods to slightly more civilized ways, certain unsporting practices were frowned on, and finally declared as foul. In sports, one of them, was hitting below the waist, or in boxing lingo, ‘below the belt!’

The term, moved from just boxing, to describing any form of behavior that was unfair.

Not only were rules framed but defensive gear introduced: In cricket the batsmen wears appropriate shields, called abdomen guards, so a fast, stray ball is stopped from causing injury to a vulnerable area of the batsman’s body.
But what does the poor journalist, activist, or anybody who speaks out against the powerful wear for protection against unfair body blows rained on them?

There’s no umpire or referee blowing a whistle, holding up a yellow card or shouting foul!

An actress is accused of abetting the suicide of an actor, and instead of moving head-on to prove her role in the hanging, today she is in jail for taking drugs.

Another actress talks boldly against a state government, flies to the city to find her office demolished!
TV anchors and TV channels find Income raids coming their way for asking questioning!

No Democracy should allow this.Democracy is the only form of governance that calls for a fair fight. Debates or arguments are allowed, and like boxers in a boxing ring, blow traded for blow, with no participant playing foul.

What happens when a boxer hits below the belt? Apart from the referee decrying it foul, the public howl, and bay for the blood of the spoilsport.

But wait, let’s have an imaginary scene where the public react otherwise: When Mike Tyson bites off Evander Hollywood’s ear! Imaginary, okay!

“Ladies and gentleman!” shouts the boxing referee, “Tyson has bitten off Evander’s ear! Look at that! What a great bite! Look at earless Holyfield, bloodied and defeated! He deserves it! Great job Tyson! Ladies and gentlemen, may I present the next World Heavyweight champion!”  

And the public, yell and shout and clap their hands with glee, reveling in the absolute unfairness of one boxer engaging and even winning in a ‘hitting below the belt’ act!

What happens after that?

He bites the ear of every opponent, and soon it becomes a recognized boxing technique, not just in the World Heavyweight championships but in every boxing match and street fight, till everybody goes around with a part of their ear chewed off.   

Are you waiting for that?

If a violent sport like boxing could condemn an act like that, then a beautiful system like democracy, a gentle country like ours, should also do the same.

Fight fair: Punch for punch; responsible government reply to a fearless citizen’s question and criminal investigation only for accused crime.

It all depends on you spectators, if you want no more ‘hitting below the belt’ scenes..!   

bobsbanter@gmail.com  
     

Recent Posts

The RSS has spent decades building an international ecosystem of charities, cultural bodies, donors and political influence. Bhagwat's centenary outreach seeks to consolidate it. The West has noticed.
apicture Oliver D'Souza
07 Sep 2026
Bhagwat's New York sermon offered the world an India where diversity is sacred and every citizen belongs. Back home, the reality is far less harmonious: food, faith, dress, history and citizenship its
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
07 Sep 2026
If you ask me which was the greatest news story I reported or commented upon during my 53 years in journalism, I would answer without batting an eyelid: the eradication of smallpox from India.
apicture A. J. Philip
07 Sep 2026
The Taliban tried to silence Malala with a bullet. India's new fundamentalists wield sticks, censorship and intimidation. The weapons have changed; the instinct has not. Both fear the same enemy: a yo
apicture Cedric Prakash
07 Sep 2026
The Church cannot preach courage to its flock while practising caution in the face of persecution. When Christians are attacked and sacred spaces desecrated, polite memoranda are no substitute for act
apicture P. A. Chacko
07 Sep 2026
They write of democracy from rooms where democracy has never had to enter the kitchen, where equality is discussed beneath lights that never reveal the darkness outside.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
07 Sep 2026
According to Koenraad Elst, when Hedgewar started the RSS, he had purely pragmatic ends in mind. The first thing he had to guard against was British imperial surveillance. He carefully adopted secret-
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
07 Sep 2026
Perhaps Mr Bhagwat had brought this beautiful version of India in his luggage. Perhaps it had cleared American immigration because unity, unlike some Indians, is still welcome in the United States.
apicture Robert Clements
07 Sep 2026
You may be supremely happy that your Freedom of Religion Bill has received the President's assent and has now come into force in Maharashtra. But there is an irony that you may not have noticed.
apicture A. J. Philip
31 Aug 2026
India's children are discovering the power of protest. Their demands are modest. Safe classrooms, clean water, toilets, teachers and dignity. If governments silence those who expose these failures rat
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
31 Aug 2026