hidden image

British Era Censor Board is Back

Joseph Maliakan Joseph Maliakan
19 Apr 2021

With the abolition of the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT), the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government at the Centre has for all practical purposes reintroduced the British era film censorship in the country.

The FCAT was a statutory body constituted by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting in 1983 under section 5D of the Cinematograph Act, 1952. Its main job was to hear appeals filed under section 5C of the Act by applicants for certification of films. The Tribunal was headed by a Chairperson and had four members including a Secretary. It was headquartered in New Delhi.

The abolition of the Tribunal means that in future film-makers and producers aggrieved by any decisions of the Censor Board will have to appeal to the High Court which will not only be very expensive but also time-consuming. 

Earlier, with the inclusion of film personalities in the Tribunal, the film-makers were certain that they would receive a reasonable decision on their appeals. It now remains to be seen how High Court judges unfamiliar with the complexities of film-making will take decisions.

In India, politically explosive films like Kisa Kursi Ka, Nakshbandhi and Andhi have been made in the past. However, the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), popularly known as Censor Board, has been hanging like a sword of Damocles over the heads of film-makers. Many of its decisions have been quite arbitrary and unreasonable. 

All films must get a CBFC Certificate before they can be released in theatres or telecast on television. The CBFC which consists of a Chairperson and 23 members appointed by the Central Government certifies films under four categories. U: Unrestricted public exhibition (suitable for all age groups); U/A: Parental guidance for children under age 12; A: Restricted to Adults (Suitable for 18 years and above); and S: Restricted to a specialized group of people, such as engineers, doctors or scientists. 

Whenever the CBFC denies certification or suggests arbitrary cuts in any film, the film-makers could approach the Tribunal in appeal. In most cases, the Tribunal has been very quick in giving its decisions and has overturned many of the decisions of the Board.

The film-makers are completely shattered by the decision to abolish the Tribunal which in several cases championed the artistic freedom. It cleared several recent films like Great Grand Masti; Saheb, Bibi, Golaam; Haraamkhor; Lipstick Under My Burkha; and Babumoshai Bandookbaz with an “A” certificate over-riding the Censor Board’s objections. 

However, in the case of En Dino Muzaffarnagar, in August 2014, the FCAT upheld the CBFC’s order refusing to certify the film arguing that the documentary had “grave potential of creating communal disharmony.”

Vishal Bharadwaj termed it a “sad day for cenema”. Hansal Mehta described the abolition of FCAT quite restrictive and arbitrary. Anurag Kashyap said it would discourage film-makers from working on serious themes. 

The abolition of FCAT is also against the recommendations of the 2013 Justice Mudgal report and the 2016 Shyam Benegal report. While the Mudgal Committee recommended expansion of the ambit of the Tribunal, the Benegal Committee recommended that it be empowered to cover all grievances under the lines of Broadcasting Content Complaints Council.

The government’s abolition of the Tribunal through an Ordinance once again points towards the NDA government’s lack of respect for Parliamentary proceedings and democratic norms. Nobody knows what was the emergency that necessitated bringing in an Ordinance instead of waiting for the next session of Parliament. Clearly the government’s intention is to further centralize the power to censor free expression through films. For it is well-known that irrespective of the party in power, the Central Board of Film Certification has always been functioning as a strong censorship arm of the government.
 

Recent Posts

The Emergency must be remembered, not as a tool to target a political party but as a lesson against authoritarian excess. Yet, we cannot ignore that worse violations of democratic norms and human righ
apicture A. J. Philip
30 Jun 2025
Fifty years later, India faces a chilling déjà vu with an 'undeclared' Emergency. Freedom of speech is stifled, dissent is suppressed, and institutions are compromised. True democracy demands resistan
apicture Cedric Prakash
30 Jun 2025
Amit Shah's claim that those who speak English will be ashamed evidences that the BJP-RSS is trying to bring down the populace and push India into another Vedic dark age where ignorance and superstiti
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
30 Jun 2025
The NSE's ?1,400 crore settlement with SEBI raises critical concerns about India's financial markets. Any perceived regulatory capture risks eroding trust.
apicture Jaswant Kaur
30 Jun 2025
Christian education in India has had a profound influence on democracy and social justice in the country. It played a pivotal role in challenging caste oppression, promoting inclusivity, and fostering
apicture Fr Soroj Mullick, SDB
30 Jun 2025
"The spread of digital culture, particularly evident among young people, is profoundly changing their experience of space and time; it influences their daily activities, communication, and interperson
apicture Joe Eruppakkatt
30 Jun 2025
Welcome to the Happy State of Emergency: Where freedom is carefully curated, minds are pre-cooked, and Big Brother doesn't need to frown—he just raises one eyebrow... and we salute…!
apicture Robert Clements
30 Jun 2025
The North-South divide reflects India's broader regional and cultural tensions. The progress of Southern states in health, education, and development contrasts with the Hindi belt's struggles on devel
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
23 Jun 2025
India's 2027 census and ensuing delimitation will redefine its political landscape. As northern states gain influence due to burgeoning population, southern states will face reduced representation des
apicture Dr John Singarayar
23 Jun 2025
For India to become a global healthcare power, it must democratise medical education—revise outdated rules, invest in public institutions, expand seats, embrace technology, and ensure affordability. A
apicture A. J. Philip
23 Jun 2025