hidden image

Dignity of Life: Last Rites, Exercise Caution

Aarti Aarti
21 Sep 2020

Death takes away everything from a person.

Yes, it is more tragic when losing a family member or a loved one and the only solace is proper performance of death rites that is considered sacrosanct for any religion.

But deaths caused by the global novel coronavirus pandemic seems to pose serious threats, most importantly, performing last rites of the deceased due to COVID-19. Although it has been debated and argued that there was no scientific reason for families to not perform the last rites, there have been cases of families not willing to accept bodies of coronavirus patients.

Human remains should always be treated with dignity and respect, but is it happening in actual practice in the case of deceased COVID-19 patients?  

True, the chances of a fatal infection are high, if not handled with care. But the cause for concern is that religious rituals seem to have taken a backseat, even as the Union Ministry of Health‘s March 15 guidelines on burials clearly state that the family may view the face of their loved one before they are cremated or buried and all religious rituals that do not require contact are allowed.

Well, the manner in which deaths have been mounting due to COVID-19 poses a plethora of challenges to regulatory authorities. Accordingly, world over, policies and guidelines have been changing on handling the dead bodies of COVID-19 patients and India is no exception. While earlier hospitals were strictly forbidden from handing over the bodies of suspected COVID-19 cases to relatives for cremation, guidelines are undergoing changes.

When 55-year-old Dr Simon Hercules, a neurologist and founder of a speciality hospital in Chennai breathed his last a few months ago, suspecting that the cause of death was due COVID-19, his human remains were not allowed to be buried in the Cemetery due to law and order problem. At the Cemetery, nearly 40 local residents gathered and protested. Unable to convince them, his human remains was taken to another burial ground where over 70 people attacked the officials with sticks and stones. Finally, with police protection, Late Simon was buried in haste, manually.

Taking suo motu cognisance, a division bench of Madras High Court had observed that “Citizens are not expected to take law and order into their hands and if it is so, would definitely lead to anarchy. There is likelihood of similar kinds of incidents to occur in future also.” Maintaining that “the scope and ambit of Article 21 of the Constitution includes the right to have a decent burial”, the Court while invoking and highlighting the legal consequences of trespassing on burial places, also emphasized that the guidelines that have been issued by the Central government from time to time in relation to COVID-19 are expected to be known to the citizens and followed thoroughly.

Media reports of human remains of COVID-19 patients, either being dumped in garbage vans or even placed on a hospital bed next to a patient undergoing treatment, or driven away in an ambulance along with other casualties are rather disturbing. More recently, reportedly in a designated facility to treat Covid patients in Kolkata, it was alleged that the families were not informed about the end of their near and dear ones. In such a scenario, the father of a 13-year-old girl ran behind the ambulance once he came to know that his daughter was among the victims inside the vehicle.

But hopefully, the Calcutta High Court directive of this September 16 will pave way for the next kin of Covid victims to receive the human remains and perform the last rites

The Court decided a public interest litigation which among others had raised two important issues. i) The human remains/dead bodies of persons inflicted with COVID-19 were being disposed of by the administration unceremoniously and in an undignified manner without showing even a semblance of respect to the mortal remains and ii) Relatives and friends of persons admitted to hospitals with COVID-19 or persons who have contracted the disease whilst in hospitals having been admitted for some other malady, and who subsequently passed away, are not being permitted to have a last look at or to pay last respect to the mortal remains of the dead person and to perform the last rites.

In response the State Government had submitted that in the event of death of a patient, the hospital authorities shall inform the family members within one hour of death. A body cover with transparent face area shall be used. The body cover supplied earlier shall not be used. Mask and gloves will be provided to the family members by the concerned hospital after proper sanitisation. The dead body should be kept at a suitable place for 30 minutes during which the family members shall be allowed to pay their last respects.

The Court while maintaining that living with dignity includes not only the dignity of a person when he is alive but also the dignity following his death, it stated that disposal of a human body, whether or not the person dies of COVID-19, whether by cremation or burial, should be done with due respect and solemnness. The Bench also observed that the near and dear ones of a deceased person who had contracted COVID-19 should have an opportunity to have a final look at the human remains of the person and to pay their last respect and homage to the departed soul.

When the post mortem of the body is not required, it shall be handed over to the immediate next of kin of the deceased after completion of hospital formalities.

Important takeaways from the above ruling is that (i) When post mortem of the dead body is not required, the dead body shall be handed over to the immediate next of kin of the deceased i.e. the parents/surviving spouse/children, after completion of hospital formalities. (ii) The body should be secured in a body bag, the face end of which should be preferably transparent and the exterior of which will be appropriately sanitized/decontaminated so as to eliminate/minimize the risk to the people transporting the dead body. (iii) The people handling the dead body shall take standard precautions, e.g., surgical mask, gloves, etc. If available and possible, PPE should be used. (iv) The vehicle carrying the dead body to the crematorium/burial ground will be suitably decontaminated. (v) The staff of the crematorium/burial ground should be sensitized that COVID-19 does not pose additional risk. They will practice standard precautions.(vi) the face end of the body bag may be unzipped by the staff at the crematorium/burial ground to allow the relatives to see the body for one last time. At this time, religious rituals, such as reading from religious scripts, sprinkling holy water, offering grains and such other last rites that do not require touching of the body, should be allowed. (vii) After the cremation/burial the family members and the staff of the crematorium/burial ground should appropriately sanitize themselves. (viii) As a social distancing measure, large gatherings at the crematorium/burial ground should be avoided. (ix) The persons handling the dead body shall go directly from the hospitals to the crematorium/burial ground, as the case may be, and not to anywhere else including the home of the deceased where he/she last resided. (x) In case the body of a COVID-19 infected deceased is unclaimed, the same shall be cremated/buried as the case may be with due dignity, at State expense.

There is an imperative need to exercise due caution and undertake religious and cultural practices associated with death rites without crowding and physical contact.

(Published on 21 st  September 2020, Volume XXXII, Issue 39)

Recent Posts

Contrary to judicial relief, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed that Dalit Christians lose Scheduled Caste status upon conversion, sustaining a controversial 1950 order and deepening anxieties over equa
apicture John Dayal
30 Mar 2026
The recent verdict of the Supreme Court of India on whether Dalit Christians can claim Scheduled Caste status would have been less troubling had it merely erred in law. What makes it profoundly disqui
apicture A. J. Philip
30 Mar 2026
Justice delivery in India depends equally on the judiciary and the executive, yet systemic failures, such as case backlogs, overuse of stringent laws, and prolonged detentions, undermine liberty and f
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
30 Mar 2026
The Allahabad High Court's recent ruling in the case involving Rev. Father Vineet Vincent Pereira has sparked significant debate. The court refused to quash proceedings under Section 295A of the India
apicture Special Correspondent
30 Mar 2026
Commemorating Oscar Romero's martyrdom is recalling his fearless defence of the poor, his call to resist injustice, and his sacrifice. It challenges India today to confront oppression, uphold truth, a
apicture Cedric Prakash
30 Mar 2026
Withdrawing futile treatment is not euthanasia but an ethical, lawful act grounded in dignity and autonomy, supporting living wills and compassionate end-of-life care. Misleading words like "passive e
apicture J Charles Davis
30 Mar 2026
In the present context of growing ineffectiveness of the United Nations to curb international conflicts and its failure to provide international peace and security, and in the face of unilateralism of
apicture G Ramachandram
30 Mar 2026
Your tenth stage Is denial: The washing of hands In the blood of semantics.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
30 Mar 2026
The current budget for 2026-27 signals a renewed commitment to urban development, earmarking INR 1 billion (?1 lakh crore) for the 'Urban Challenge Fund' with the ambitious goal of transforming cities
apicture Fr. John Felix Raj & Prabhat Kumar Datta
30 Mar 2026
Perhaps what we need is a small board outside every office of authority. A simple reminder. "You are here temporarily. Please do not disturb permanent memories."
apicture Robert Clements
30 Mar 2026