hidden image

POOR INNOCENTS SUFFER RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY

Chhotebhai Chhotebhai
30 Aug 2021

KANPUR: It is an altogether familiar pattern where poor innocents, usually from Minority communities, become the victims of communal bigotry and hate propaganda. The latest such incident occurred in Kanpur on 11th August.

The victim was Afsar Ahmed, the driver of an e-rickshaw, living in an unauthorised slum under Barra Police Station. He was returning home for his midday meal when a gang purportedly belonging to the Bajrang Dal (BD) attacked him without provocation, forcing him to chant the religious slogan “Jai Sri Ram”. A video went viral on social media showing his seven year old daughter pleading with the attackers to spare the life of her father. 

Magsaysay awardee, Dr Sandeep Pande, founder of the Socialist Party India (SPI), contacted me to do a fact check on the incident together with his party workers. Accordingly, six citizens, from various political and religious persuasions, visited the victim’s tenement on 18th August. The road leading there was barricaded by the police and all visitors had to enter their names in a register. There was 24x7 police bandobast to ensure the safety of the persons concerned and to prevent anybody from trying to draw political capital from the same.

One needs to record that immediately after the incident Ms Raveena Tyagi, the Deputy Commissioner of Police, South, (DCP) had arrested the ring leaders of the attack despite pressure from the ruling establishment. She had also immediately visited the victim family and comforted the traumatised child.

This slum settlement has about 80 families of whom about 20 are Muslim. At the time of our visit the victim was not there so we spoke with his wife Rubina Begum. She stated that neither her husband nor her family had any enmity with anybody else in the neighbourhood. They were poor people eking out their existence. There had been a minor altercation between Rani Gautam (whose house faces Afsar’s) and Quraisha Begum and her sons Salman and Saddam. Unfortunately their anger and frustration was taken out on Afsar. The police corroborated Rubina’s version of the events.

What is not clear is whether Rani Gautam called the BD workers, or they were just passing by and took advantage of the situation. It is alleged that Rani is connected with Hindutva forces. It is worth noting that all these families are quite poor; their houses built with plastic sheets and bamboo lattices etc. This further confirms what sociologists tell us, that “Violence is the option of those who have nothing to lose”.  

The delegation was led by KM Bhai of the SP(I), chhotebhai and Dr Minhaj Jafri of the Kanpur Nagrik Manch, Mohd Suleiman, National President of the Indian National League, Pratap Sahni of the CPM and Bharat Rajyogi of AAP. They felt that their visit was an act of solidarity with the victim family, sending out a clear message that they were not alone. On her part Rubina wants justice to be done against the attackers.


 

Recent Posts

Bengal once welcomed missionaries who built schools, hospitals and presses, enriching the region's education, healthcare and reform. Today, priests are told to leave their parishes. The irony is devas
apicture CM Paul
17 Aug 2026
With Christians constituting barely 2.3 per cent of India's population, the charge of mass forced conversion defies logic. Yet anti-conversion laws pivot charity into "allurement," suspicion and crime
apicture Chhotebhai
17 Aug 2026
Dr RB Sreekala's work brings out something beautiful in Koodashappana: how a German Jesuit, Kerala's Malayalam tradition and Sanskrit learning came together to tell the story of Jesus in the language
apicture A. J. Philip
17 Aug 2026
Eighty years after Independence, the question is whether Indians remain free. With increasing threats to citizenship, dissent, faith and liberty, Swaraj demands a second struggle to defend freedom for
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
17 Aug 2026
The Old Testament is insistent on this point almost to the point of severity. When Moses approached the burning bush, he was told, "Do not come near; take your sandals off your feet, for the place on
apicture Dr K. M. George
17 Aug 2026
Nehru's Cabinet was surrounded by persons who did not share his ideology. They were retained mostly out of a sense of loyalty to old colleagues, persons who fought side by side for Independence.
apicture G Ramachandram
17 Aug 2026
You think I am a forbidden fruit, unworthy of your love. But I never think You are a forbidden fruit, Even though India forbids your Nagalim.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
17 Aug 2026
The truly confident leader does not need ridicule. He does not humiliate opponents or turn every speech into a performance about his own greatness. His strength is visible in restraint, fairness, humi
apicture Robert Clements
17 Aug 2026
Political independence was never Gandhi's final destination. He envisioned a Republic rooted in constitutional values, social justice and human dignity. Every Independence Day invites a single questio
apicture Joe Eruppakkatt
10 Aug 2026
The Arthashastra counsels engagement, accountability and informed leadership—not disappearance. A government that retreats from Parliament while students demand justice betrays not only democratic con
apicture A. J. Philip
10 Aug 2026