hidden image

Stan Loved Them With All His Heart and Paid With Life

Joseph Maliakan Joseph Maliakan
12 Jul 2021

Months before he died in custody, 84-year-old Jesuit priest Stan Swamy, who fought for the rights of the Adivasis, had written his own epitaph: “In the current system, justice is beyond the means of those who have been falsely accused.” 

Nine months ago, in October 2020, when he was arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) though he was suffering from different ailments including Parkinsons, he could carry out essential chores like eating, drinking and bathing on his own. But within weeks of imprisonment, living in inhuman conditions, his health deteriorated fast and in spite of repeated pleadings before various courts he did not receive proper medical care on time.

Even a very  casual examination  of the life and activities of Fr. Stan and the actions of Jharkhand police when the BJP-led government ruled the state and the National Investigation Agency (NIA) will reveal that they were hell bent on fixing him by hook or crook.

Though Fr Stan started as an academician, being the Director of Indian Social Institute, Bangaluru, his heart was always with the Dalits and marginalized people. This brought him to Jharkhand to work amid Adivasis. In the late 1980s he became the Director of Jharkhandi  Organisation for Human Rights Centre, popularly known as JOHAR, a word of greeting among  Adivasis. In the 12 years he headed the organization, Fr. Stan became part of the life and struggle of the Adivasis. 

In the 1990s as India opened its economy a number of multinational companies eyed the mineral rich Adivasi lands. In the name of development their lands were illegally taken over, displacing thousands of Adivasis.  Fr Stan not only supported their struggle but actively participated in their protest activities.

“Every mine that is dug not only destroys the green forests, fertile lands and water bodies but also displaces entire village habitations,” Fr. Stan pointed out in support of the Adivasis. In 2006, after the formation of Jharkhand, he set up Bagaicha in Ranchi which was primarily meant for training, research and advocacy, focusing on identity, dignity, justice and empowerment of the Adivasis.

Panchayats (Extension in Scheduled Areas) Act 1996 (PESA) empowers gramsabhas to take responsibility for development of villages. Fr. Stan criticized successive Jharkhand governments about the non-implementation of the provisions of PESA which adversely affected the lives of the Adivasis.  Jal, Jungle and Jameen belonged to the Adivasis, he staunchly believed. 

Consequently, he actively participated in the Adivasis’ struggle against the Netrahat Field Firing Project and the Koel Karo dam project that were to displace thousands of them. He wrote extensively against these projects in newspapers.

Now we come to the most grievous crime Fr. Stan allegedly committed. During 2014-15 the Jharkhand Government indiscriminately arrested thousands of Adivasis, especially youths. He convened a meeting of people of goodwill to discuss the nature of the intervention required to rescue the youths from incarceration. There was very good response, especially from the legal community. Sudha  Bharadwaj who has been arrested by the NIA and has been charged under various sections of the draconian Unlawful Activities Act,1967 (UAPA ) also took part in the discussions. 

The discussions led to the setting up of a forum named Persecuted Prisoners Solidarity Committee (PPSC) to approach the courts on behalf of the Under Trial Prisoners (UTPs). Thereafter, based on the available data on the arrested Dalit and Adivasi youths, Fr. Stan filed a petition under public interest litigation (PIL) in the Jharkhand High Court. The Court on the basis of the evidence provided in the petition directed the government of Jharkhand to furnish complete information about under trial prisoners in the state. Shockingly, the state is yet to submit its report!

However, to teach Fr. Stan a lesson in good behavior, the Jharkhand Administration registered a criminal case against him on the basis of a Facebook comment he made on the Pathalgadi movement. Pathals are stones erected at village entrances according to age-old Adivasi custom. Adivasi villagers in Khunti district inscribed on the pathals various rights guaranteed to them by the Constitution of India and the PESA. The government labeled all those who supported the Pathalgadi movement as anti-nationals.

An FIR was registered against Stan and 19 others for supporting the Pathalgadi movement in 2018.  A year after the FIR was registered, a Khunti court declared Fr Stan a ‘proclaimed absconder’ under section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code and ordered attachment of his properties. At that time he was away in Bangaluru for medical treatment.  In October 2019, the police took away two tables, a steel shelf, three plastic chairs, a mattress and a pillow from his room.

Fr. Stan challenged the allegations in the High Court where the prosecution described him as a “dreaded criminal.” The High Court on December 6, 2019 declared that proper procedures were not followed in the cases against him and absolved him of all charges. At the end of December 2019, the new Jharkhand government headed by Hemant Soren decided to withdraw all cases related to the Pathalgadi movement. 

But the Union Government for well-known reasons wanted to fix Fr Stan and other civil and human right champions in the country and implicated them in the Bhima-Koregaon conspiracy case. The government, police, courts, and media have become collaborators in the ‘great design’ to develop the nation by depriving the Adivasis and Dalits of their Jal, Jungle and Jameen.

Recent Posts

Contrary to judicial relief, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed that Dalit Christians lose Scheduled Caste status upon conversion, sustaining a controversial 1950 order and deepening anxieties over equa
apicture John Dayal
30 Mar 2026
The recent verdict of the Supreme Court of India on whether Dalit Christians can claim Scheduled Caste status would have been less troubling had it merely erred in law. What makes it profoundly disqui
apicture A. J. Philip
30 Mar 2026
Justice delivery in India depends equally on the judiciary and the executive, yet systemic failures, such as case backlogs, overuse of stringent laws, and prolonged detentions, undermine liberty and f
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
30 Mar 2026
The Allahabad High Court's recent ruling in the case involving Rev. Father Vineet Vincent Pereira has sparked significant debate. The court refused to quash proceedings under Section 295A of the India
apicture Special Correspondent
30 Mar 2026
Commemorating Oscar Romero's martyrdom is recalling his fearless defence of the poor, his call to resist injustice, and his sacrifice. It challenges India today to confront oppression, uphold truth, a
apicture Cedric Prakash
30 Mar 2026
Withdrawing futile treatment is not euthanasia but an ethical, lawful act grounded in dignity and autonomy, supporting living wills and compassionate end-of-life care. Misleading words like "passive e
apicture J Charles Davis
30 Mar 2026
In the present context of growing ineffectiveness of the United Nations to curb international conflicts and its failure to provide international peace and security, and in the face of unilateralism of
apicture G Ramachandram
30 Mar 2026
Your tenth stage Is denial: The washing of hands In the blood of semantics.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
30 Mar 2026
The current budget for 2026-27 signals a renewed commitment to urban development, earmarking INR 1 billion (?1 lakh crore) for the 'Urban Challenge Fund' with the ambitious goal of transforming cities
apicture Fr. John Felix Raj & Prabhat Kumar Datta
30 Mar 2026
Perhaps what we need is a small board outside every office of authority. A simple reminder. "You are here temporarily. Please do not disturb permanent memories."
apicture Robert Clements
30 Mar 2026