ASSETS: Unlocking or Locking Up?

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
06 Sep 2021

An interesting caricature appeared recently in a news portal. A man in suits, representing private sector, is precariously hanging in the air holding one hand to the branch of a tree. Next to him is a woman, apparently Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitaraman, clutching on to another branch of the same tree and suspended in the air. While the man (private sector) is hoping that the government will come to his rescue, the government is longing for the private sector to come to its rescue. This depiction unmistakably portrays the desperate situation both of them are facing. (See the caricature in the cover story).

 The recent announcement of the government to opt for National Monetization Pipeline – leasing out its assets to private sector entities for a particular period – is seemingly the result of the government’s ambitious plan of sale of public firms not reaching anywhere near the target. In the last few years, the target of disinvestment announced in the Budget has miserably failed, forcing the government to frantically look for an alternative to generate revenue. The asset monetization plan seems to be a baby born out of that frenzied search for revenue mobilization.  

The recycling idea might look great. The plan enables the government to amass funds from private players without transferring the ownership of the assets to them. The government-owned roads, railways, power plants, gas pipelines, airports, ports, warehouses, etc. will be leased out for long periods – probably running into several decades – for upfront or periodic payments. The private sector is expected to operate and maintain the assets based on the terms of the contract. The logic behind this scheme is that the private sector, through better efficiency compared to the sluggish way of government work, would be able to operate them profitably. The revenue that accrues from this arrangement would be reinvested by the government in new infrastructure or deployed for other public purposes. Moreover, the assets transferred would be back into the government kitty after the expiry of the lease period. The spin doctors are marketing it as the panacea for India’s dire need for funds to finance its dream projects. 

But all is not hunky-dory as it looks. Since the private players have to make profit out of the assets they take on lease, the product/service prices could go up phenomenally. As there will be only a handful of private players who will manage large infra assets, there is the danger of monopoly or semi-monopoly situation. After all, no corporate house is in the field to do charity. For example, the consumers may end up paying higher tolls on highways, user charges on airports, increased rate for piped gas, etc. Moreover, once the government hands over projects to private players, it would not be in a position to intervene during the contract period even if the latter’s decisions go against public interest. Since the leasing period could run up to several decades, it could lead to long-term headache for the changing governments as there could be a clash of interests between the contracting parties. Working out the nitty-gritty of the mega plan, which is expected to earn an ambitious figure of Rs. 5.96 lakh crore for the government, is not going to be an easy task. In trying to unlock the value of public assets, will it end up tying the government in knots?
 

Recent Posts

In a world scarred by war, hatred, and inhuman leadership, education must humanise, not merely inform. Sanjeevani Vidyapeeth shows how empowering the marginalised with values, character, and competenc
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
07 Jul 2025
The sinking of MSC ELSA 3 off Kerala's coast exposes a toxic mix of corporate impunity, political complicity, and environmental neglect. As hazardous cargo threatens lives and livelihoods, the silence
apicture Joseph Maliakan
07 Jul 2025
In a world slipping into chaos, where leaders trade threats and valorise violence, India mirrors this decay, silencing dissent, weaponising identity, and pushing the marginalised to the margins. The c
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
07 Jul 2025
When Fr. Stan Swamy died on July 5, 2021, the world of truth and justice was shocked and saddened. Those who belonged to this group were convinced that his death was not a natural one, but a premedita
apicture Cedric Prakash
07 Jul 2025
The strength of India is in her democracy; the unity of India is in her diversity; the heritage of India is in her hospitality, the breath of India is in her principle of Ahimsa/non-violence, and the
apicture Fr. L. Michael Collins
07 Jul 2025
Marking June 25 as 'Samvidhan Hatya Diwas' is a calculated distortion of history, designed to vilify Indira Gandhi while deflecting from the ongoing, undeclared Emergency under Modi.
apicture G Ramachandram
07 Jul 2025
When a nation stops examining itself, it stops evolving. When a people stop questioning, they stop progressing. And when truth is replaced by lies, it takes only a few years for credibility to erode —
apicture Robert Clements
07 Jul 2025
The Emergency must be remembered, not as a tool to target a political party but as a lesson against authoritarian excess. Yet, we cannot ignore that worse violations of democratic norms and human righ
apicture A. J. Philip
30 Jun 2025
Fifty years later, India faces a chilling déjà vu with an 'undeclared' Emergency. Freedom of speech is stifled, dissent is suppressed, and institutions are compromised. True democracy demands resistan
apicture Cedric Prakash
30 Jun 2025
Amit Shah's claim that those who speak English will be ashamed evidences that the BJP-RSS is trying to bring down the populace and push India into another Vedic dark age where ignorance and superstiti
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
30 Jun 2025