A Tilted Platform

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
07 Sep 2020

Social media platforms like Facebook and WhatsApp have well laid out policies on posting their contents just as print and electronic media are bound by rules and regulations. The Facebook had a few years back published internal editorial guidelines to rebut accusations that it was politically biased in showing news content on its pages. Shockingly, such policies are honoured more in breach than in observance. Social media is several notches ahead in violating own policies for promoting self-interest. The latest statistics show that WhatsApp has around 200 crore and Facebook has 130 crore users across the globe. This figure is tentatively put at 40 crores and 24 crores respectively in India. In this background of proliferation of social media users, the articles published recently in international media, especially Wall Street Journal, pinpointing how Facebook is showing favouritism towards the ruling party in India, assume great significance; any biased presentation of news content can have disastrous results.

Reports point out that Facebook is reluctant to take down posts by right-wing leaders while they do so with regard to posts by those who oppose the present regime and its core supporters. To substantiate this charge, the Wall Street Journal referred to BJP’s Telangana MLA T. Raja Singh whose posts have not been removed from Facebook despite its controversial content denigrating Muslims. Despite BJP coming out all guns blazing against the report, the newspaper has been vindicated, though quite late, as the Facebook has now banned the MLA from its platform for violating its policy on content promoting violence and hate. Earlier, the Facebook complicated the issue by the reported statement of its Public Policy Director in India who had told her colleagues that “punishing violations by politicians from Mr Modi’s party would affect the company’s business prospects in the country.” If proved true, such partisan approach in monitoring the content on social media platforms is outrageous to say the least.

The media exposures on Facebook have shown that some of its news content could affect the religious and social harmony in the country. The Congress has termed it ‘brazen assault’ on democracy and peaceful co-existence of people. In a related development, the Delhi Assembly’s Peace and Harmony Committee has decided to summon Facebook officials on hate content in its posts. The committee has received several complaints against the officials of Facebook for their allegedly deliberate inaction to contain hateful content. It seems to be an afterthought that the Modi government too is trying to turn the tables on Facebook. In a letter to Mark Zuckerberg, Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad stated that the social media platform is against those who have right-of-centre ideology.

Any unholy nexus between the government of the largest democracy and the biggest social media platform can lead to dangerous situations. It can swing public opinion in favour of the “one who pays the piper”. Social media platforms should not be weighed down by business interests; rather they have a social commitment to not harm the harmony prevailing in a country. Hence a thorough investigation is needed to find out whether such platforms are being misused for posting biased news content. They cannot be allowed to go scot-free if they allow certain preferred ‘clients’ to indulge in hate-mongering, thereby putting the nation’s future in peril.

(Published on 07th September 2020, Volume XXXII, Issue 37)

Recent Posts

Dear fellow Indians, friends of India, and all well-wishers: Not often does one get to witness history being written. Before our eyes, we see history happen in the very NOW. We read in history book
apicture Stanislaus Alla
12 Oct 2026
A fundamental distinction must be maintained between carefully examining a case's facts and rejecting an institution's application on that basis, and making sweeping generalisations about an entire re
apicture Adv. Rev. Dr George Thekkekara
12 Oct 2026
Vismaya's public dissent, Riya's demand for justice, and Yashaswinee's defiance of political inheritance are a growing sign that young women are refusing to remain silent spectators. Their courage in
apicture A. J. Philip
12 Oct 2026
The book "Politics, Policy and Predictions: Views from the Front Row of Parliament" by Derek O'Brien, Rajya Sabha MP and leader of the All India Trinamool Congress Parliamentary Party, throws light on
apicture Marydasan John
12 Oct 2026
As Leader of the Opposition, Rahul Gandhi waves the national Tricolour from atop police barricades, and Union Cabinet ministers celebrate Prime Minister Narendra Modi's dubious silver jubilee—13 years
apicture John Dayal
12 Oct 2026
Gandhi need not return as another Mahatma. He can live through a generation that resists hatred without hatred, confronts injustice without violence, challenges consumerism, defends the marginalised a
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
12 Oct 2026
Formation is not merely about producing priests and religious who follow rules, recite the Creed and wear habits. It is about nurturing conviction, maturity and integrity.
apicture Fr. Anil Prakash D'Souza, OP
12 Oct 2026
What exactly are we celebrating when our festivities leave children gasping, elders struggling to breathe, animals terrified, and the air poisoned? Culture evolves with human understanding. The real t
apicture P. A. Chacko
12 Oct 2026
The press is the voice of the people. It carries the complaint of the pensioner, the cry of the assaulted woman, the anger of the unemployed graduate and the question the powerful would prefer nobody
apicture Robert Clements
12 Oct 2026
Corrective press notes are not substitutes for accountability. This crisis demands independent investigation, judicial scrutiny and reversal of the SIR. Institutional complicity is the gravest betraya
apicture Oliver D'Souza
05 Oct 2026