Kohli Bats for a Cause

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
15 Nov 2021

When Virat Kohli stood up to speak for his teammate Mohammed Shami, who was facing the ire of uncouth Hindutva forces for Pakistan’s victory against India in the T20 World Cup match, he preferred to stand on a new pitch. Pakistan got the better of India due to the latter’s poor performance and Shami’s role in the inglorious defeat was nothing more than that of other team members. But the fascists singled out Shami, the only Muslim face in the team, to be on their line of fire. 

The cyber-attack on him was out-and-out communal, in line with the Islamophobia prevailing in the country. Instead of coming out in open with outright support to the beleaguered cricketer, many ‘illustrious’ sportspersons have been guarded in their reaction. They wavered in their stand; they vacillated in speaking out against the communal elements; they frittered away an opportunity to be seen with their ‘sports-mate’. 

Herein enters Kohli proving his mettle as the captain of the team. He solidly stood behind his teammate and backed him to the hilt. Sticking his neck out, he unleashed a no-holds-barred attack on the communal forces that were after Shami’s blood. 

Without mincing words he said ‘attacking someone over one’s religion was the most pathetic thing that a human being can do’. He killed two birds in one shot: defended his teammate passionately and showed the communal detractors their place. 

Kohli also showed a mirror to the so-called celebrities that it was not enough to make use of their ‘celebrity status’ to rake in money, they should also speak up for the victims of injustice and inequality. 

Their celebrity status, bestowed on them by the people, should become a means for defending the people and helping them in times of dire straits. He blazed a new pitch commendably. In doing so, Kohli joined the league of many other international athletes and sportspersons who have made use of their status to protest against racial discrimination, communal atrocities, human rights violations and war-mongering. Some of them have suffered personally for their acts of courage and conviction.     

Kohli’s fearless act of defending Shami is a slap on the face of the governments that went after those who applauded the victory of Pakistan in the T20 match. The Uttar Pradesh Government, led by Yogi Adityanath, was particularly harsh in threatening to invoke sedition charges against those who celebrated it. Several FIRs were registered across the State and many other States followed suit. 

It is absurd that the governments did treat with kid gloves those who unleashed communal venom against Shami, but went after the people who clapped the victory of Pakistan. Some of the educational institutions went to the extent of suspending students for celebrating the Pak victory. 

An unfortunate development is that democratically elected governments are taking the path and talking the language of religious fanatics and fringe elements. Their pledge to protect the principles enshrined in the Constitution is ripped to shreds. 

Would the governments and the institutions have acted the way they did if some other country had defeated India and the people had celebrated the former’s victory. Herein lies the significance of the role played by Kohli at a time when the heart of India is poisoned by communal venom.

Recent Posts

Bengal once welcomed missionaries who built schools, hospitals and presses, enriching the region's education, healthcare and reform. Today, priests are told to leave their parishes. The irony is devas
apicture CM Paul
17 Aug 2026
With Christians constituting barely 2.3 per cent of India's population, the charge of mass forced conversion defies logic. Yet anti-conversion laws pivot charity into "allurement," suspicion and crime
apicture Chhotebhai
17 Aug 2026
Dr RB Sreekala's work brings out something beautiful in Koodashappana: how a German Jesuit, Kerala's Malayalam tradition and Sanskrit learning came together to tell the story of Jesus in the language
apicture A. J. Philip
17 Aug 2026
Eighty years after Independence, the question is whether Indians remain free. With increasing threats to citizenship, dissent, faith and liberty, Swaraj demands a second struggle to defend freedom for
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
17 Aug 2026
The Old Testament is insistent on this point almost to the point of severity. When Moses approached the burning bush, he was told, "Do not come near; take your sandals off your feet, for the place on
apicture Dr K. M. George
17 Aug 2026
Nehru's Cabinet was surrounded by persons who did not share his ideology. They were retained mostly out of a sense of loyalty to old colleagues, persons who fought side by side for Independence.
apicture G Ramachandram
17 Aug 2026
You think I am a forbidden fruit, unworthy of your love. But I never think You are a forbidden fruit, Even though India forbids your Nagalim.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
17 Aug 2026
The truly confident leader does not need ridicule. He does not humiliate opponents or turn every speech into a performance about his own greatness. His strength is visible in restraint, fairness, humi
apicture Robert Clements
17 Aug 2026
Political independence was never Gandhi's final destination. He envisioned a Republic rooted in constitutional values, social justice and human dignity. Every Independence Day invites a single questio
apicture Joe Eruppakkatt
10 Aug 2026
The Arthashastra counsels engagement, accountability and informed leadership—not disappearance. A government that retreats from Parliament while students demand justice betrays not only democratic con
apicture A. J. Philip
10 Aug 2026