Power-Hungry Centre

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
22 Mar 2021

Centralization of power is the trademark of autocracy. In a democracy, power should be with the people, and their elected representatives. Any law to the contrary, howsoever sugar-coated it may be, will put the axe to the root of democracy. This came to light in the Lok Sabha recently when the Centre introduced the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Bill 2021. Delhi has seen perennial clash, especially after the AAP government came to power, between the elected government led by the Chief Minister and the Lieutenant Governor. The problem arises mainly because of the ambiguities in the 1991 Act which established Delhi as a Union Territory with an elected Assembly. The conflict took a serious turn when the AAP government decided to implement some of its pro-people programmes. The Kejriwal government realized that the Lieutenant Governor was a stumbling block in implementing many of its policies as the latter insisted that files should be sent to him before executing any policy. 

This had led to a stalemate in governance especially during the previous term of the Kejriwal government. However, the Supreme Court’s verdict in 2018 led to a truce between the two warring centres of governance. The five-Judge Bench held that concurrence of the L-G was not necessary in taking decisions on subjects other than police, public order, and land. The Bench opined that if the elected government has to take permission from the L-G on each issue, it will be a negation of the principles of the representative form of governance and democracy. This verdict came as a relief for the Kejriwal government which then stopped sending many files to the L-G for his concurrence. As directed by the apex court, it was only keeping the L-G informed of the decisions taken by the government, and not taking prior permission.  

The Bill introduced in the Lok Sabha is apparently a negation of the Supreme Court verdict. The core of the controversy is that, according to the Bill, the expression ‘government’ referred to in any law to be made by the Assembly shall mean Lieutenant Governor. The Centre claims that the Bill is meant to define the powers and responsibilities of the government and the L-G as per the Supreme Court judgment. However, the purpose seems to gain backdoor entry and control the government through the office of the L-G, who is an appointee of the Centre. It is feared that this move will take away power from the elected government and the L-G will become the centre of governance. 

It is no secret that the BJP has not been able to come back to power in the national Capital after the first government led by it was defeated by the Congress party in 1998. Despite Narendra Modi’s coming to power at the Centre, the BJP has not been able to make much headway in the State politics. Even when the saffron party swept the polls in the general elections, it had to eat the dust in State elections. The new Bill is a clear indication that the Centre wants to have a bigger share in the governance pie of the National Capital Territory of Delhi. This sends out the message that the ruling party at the Centre is opposed to the autonomy of States and independence of elected governments. This is an ill-conceived move as power should rest with the elected government in a democracy.
 

Recent Posts

India's ambitious overhaul of its labour law architecture—by consolidating 29 existing laws into four comprehensive Labour Codes—is projected as a landmark reform intended to simplify compliance, prom
apicture Jose Vattakuzhy
01 Dec 2025
Across India, workers and unions are resisting labour codes that dismantle decades of hard-won rights. As corporate elites are celebrated, labourers face exclusion, precarity and silencing. The battle
apicture Prakash Louis
01 Dec 2025
I have always considered myself a temple-goer. That description may seem inadequate, for my journeys have taken me from the southern tip of the subcontinent to the Himalayan foothills, tracing not mer
apicture A. J. Philip
01 Dec 2025
Sixteen BLO deaths in three weeks expose the brutal human cost of an impossible SIR timeline. As overworked field staff collapse under pressure, the Election Commission denies responsibility, and an a
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
01 Dec 2025
Two Jesuit moments, a century apart, reveal a stark contrast: courage that welcomed Gandhi, and caution that silenced a Stan Swamy lecture. As we mark the feast of St. Xavier, we are asked not to judg
apicture Fr. Sebastian James, SJ
01 Dec 2025
O Father of India, on this sacred day, Not in prayer of sorrow do we gather, For your light is still dancing in our hearts. A fire that never dies, never ends.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
01 Dec 2025
As 2025 draws to a close, the Constitution's guarantees feel symbolic to millions. With courts, policing, voter rolls and land rights tilting in one direction, religious minorities confront a future w
apicture John Dayal
01 Dec 2025
Beneath the speeches of Constitution Day lies a nation in peril. Rights are eroded, institutions compromised, minorities targeted, and democracy is hollowed out. Ambedkar's warnings echo today, demand
apicture Cedric Prakash
01 Dec 2025
Aeschylus, the Greek tragedian, wanted to know how he was destined to die. Hence, he consulted a fortune teller who told him the truth and nothing but the truth. "You would meet your death under a fal
apicture P. Raja
01 Dec 2025
Picture two engines joined together. Both powerful, both capable of pulling a nation forward. But one engine pulls east and the other west. They strain. They struggle. And the train goes nowhere.
apicture Robert Clements
01 Dec 2025