Stinging Questions

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
30 Jan 2023
The Central Government’s move to block news portal and social media links to the documentary has reinforced the fear that the government has skeletons in its cupboard to hide.

The two-part BBC documentary India: The Modi Question has shaken the country to the extent that it has been made unavailable in India. The Central Government’s move to block news portal and social media links to the documentary has reinforced the fear that the government has skeletons in its cupboard to hide. The first episode has vignettes from Gujarat riots of 2002 in which, according to official figures, over 1000 people, mostly Muslims, were killed. The second one deals with evocative issues from the present era -- the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), Delhi riots of 2020, chilling details of assaults by cow vigilante groups, etc. -- vividly describing the troubled relationship between the Modi government and the Muslim community. While Mr. Modi was at the helm of affairs in Gujarat when the riots happened in the State, he is heading the Government at the Centre during the events described in the second episode.

One may be tempted to argue that the Supreme Court-monitored panel had cleared Mr. Modi of any wrong doing in Gujarat riots, but questions abound over the failure of the administration in reining in the frenzied mobs that roamed around, butchering hundreds. What makes the episode one unique is the scary details from a hitherto unseen report from the British Foreign Office which reportedly held Modi ‘directly responsible’ for the ‘climate of impunity’ that enabled the violence to continue without any impediments. The BBC accessed other memos by the British Government and Western diplomats which point a finger at the then state government for its complacency. This has probably put the British government on the backfoot. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, while condemning the religious persecution, diplomatically told the Parliament that he did not agree with the characterization of Prime Minister Modi. The government of India has, meanwhile, come out with statements terming the documentary untrue and not based on facts.  

The Modi regime’s intolerance to dissent and criticism is getting exposed time and again. It had not given censor exemption to a documentary on the life and time of Rohit Vemula, the Dalit scholar at Hyderabad Central University, who died by suicide; it had asked social media platforms to take down several posts during the farmers’ stir; it has put behind bars journalists and even cartoonists for writing against the government and caricaturing it in poor light; it has not even spared stand-up comedians as some of them were arrested on cooked up charges; human rights activists have been charged under Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) for raising their voice for the Dalits and the marginalized. Thus goes the litany of the highhandedness of the government which seems paranoid about own image.

It is ironic that the Modi government used ‘emergency’ provisions to stop Indians from watching the BBC documentary while the leaders of the ruling Bhartiya Janata Party are the bitterest critics of the Emergency imposed by former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. Moreover, several BJP leaders, including Mr. Modi, continue to harp on the excesses of the Emergency days, including harsh censorship of the media, to show the Congress party in poor light. Yet, the Central Government has no qualms in laying axe to the bedrock of democracy: free, critical media.
 

Recent Posts

By choosing the name Leo XIV, the new Pope signals a commitment to justice, humility, and modern relevance—echoing Leo XIII's legacy of defending workers' rights and embracing science, while addressin
apicture A. J. Philip
12 May 2025
India's development dream demands more than GDP growth—social equity, peace, and inclusive governance. Rising communal polarisation, divisive laws, and political exploitation of religious identity thr
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
12 May 2025
"The Earth is a very small stage in a vast, cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilt by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and triumph they can become momentary masters of a frac
apicture M L Satyan
12 May 2025
In Pahalgam, the terrorists intentionally asked the names of the victims before firing them because they wanted to create a feeling in the minds of Indians that the Muslims killed the Hindus, and that
apicture Jijo Thomas Placheril
12 May 2025
Despite long opposing caste census as divisive, the BJP has now embraced it, likely for electoral gain. Rooted in upper-caste ideology, the RSS-BJP's caste politics have historically undermined social
apicture Ram Puniyani
12 May 2025
Moral ambition urges people to reject hollow careers and pursue meaningful change. Rutger Bregman critiques societal conformity, wasted talent, inequality, and environmental harm, advocating for purpo
apicture G Ramachandram
12 May 2025
The bulldozer, once a tool of construction, now symbolises state-sponsored intimidation—used to demolish homes, silence dissent, and marginalise minorities. Justice demands more than compensation; it
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
12 May 2025
If the drums must beat, let it be for celebration, not conflict. For parades, not pyres. For a country that chooses peace not because it is weak, but because it is strong enough to want no more widows
apicture Robert Clements
12 May 2025
She lost her husband in the attack, yet said she gained two Kashmiri brothers—an almost unbelievable testament to humanity rising above terror, even as the absence of security exposed the failure that
apicture A. J. Philip
05 May 2025
Amid grief, Kashmiris condemned terror and offered aid, while media and political voices stoked communal hatred. True patriotism lies in unity, accountability, and empathy—the values that can heal Ind
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
05 May 2025