Temple vs Tapasya

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
16 Jan 2023
Union Home Minister Amit Shah announced that the Ram temple at Ayodhya would be opened on January 1 next year.

In the late forties when the question of the reconstruction of Somnath temple came up, Gandhiji told Sardar Patel and others that he was in favour of rebuilding the temple, but it should not be done with government funds. It has to be undertaken wholly with private funds, Gandhiji was emphatic about it. When the time for its inauguration came, President Rajendra Prasad was invited to do that honour. He consulted Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru who dissuaded the former from it. Nehru told the President: “My dear Rajendra Babu, I confess that I do not like the idea of your associating yourself with a spectacular opening of the Somnath Temple. This is not merely visiting a temple, which can certainly be done by you or anyone else, but rather participating in a significant function which unfortunately has a number of implications.” Nehru was highlighting the principle of separating state form religion. It is another matter that the President later attended the inauguration of the temple. 

Cut to the present era. Addressing a public meeting in Tripura, which is going to polls in a month or two, Union Home Minister Amit Shah announced that the Ram temple at Ayodhya would be opened on January 1 next year. It is appalling that the announcement came neither from the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra, which is overseeing the temple construction, nor any religious leader associated with it. It is equally important to recall that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the master of ceremonies and the official yajmaan during the Bhumi Pujan ceremony of the temple in 2020. The Modi government has travelled miles and miles from the Nehru government which had the principle of separation of state from religion as one of its core agenda. With the BJP, apparently under the tutelage of the Sangh Parivar, coming to power, such niceties and distinctions have vanished into thin air.   

Juxtapose this ostentatious and brazen politicization of religion with Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s unambiguous announcement that Bharat Jodo Yatra is not for political gain, but it is a ‘tapasya’ meant to fight hate, fear, disharmony and division of the society on caste and religious lines. Religion and its associated rituals make the ‘highway’ to people’s hearts. It is the easiest and surest method to exploit the ordinary mortals and manoeuvre the gullible public to garner votes. Rahul Gandhi’s Tapasya may or may not bring in political dividends. But, at a time when the country is in the thick of religious and caste upheavals; when religious fundamentalists and fanatics clamour for a Hindu Rashtra; when the main religious minorities are threatened with annihilation, the yatra for unity and harmony sends out its message loud and clear. 

The negativity of politicising religion has to be countered by the positivity of Rahul Gandhi’s call for tapasya. The country needs politicians who desist from cashing in on the naivety of people. As the BJP enters the final year of its second term in the Centre, tide seems to have turned against it. The party is frantically searching for a vote-catching ‘achievement’ that would catapult it to power again. What better means than ‘temple politics’ to garner votes. But such short-cuts to power would do colossal damage to the country. Rahul’s Tapasya route, on the other hand, would be the ideal path to keep the nation united.

Recent Posts

Once a unifying sport, cricket has been hijacked by politics and power. The BCCI now mirrors the regime's arrogance. Global bullying and stoking jingoism domestically have turned the gentleman's game
apicture Mathew John
03 Nov 2025
ML Satyan, a prophetic voice of conscience, lived and wrote for the poor and the Church's renewal. Fearless yet compassionate, he blended faith with activism, challenging hypocrisy and comfort while i
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
03 Nov 2025
The Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision of voter lists reeks of hidden motives. By demanding fresh citizenship proof and ignoring its own past rolls, it is disenfranchising minorities and
apicture Joseph Maliakan
03 Nov 2025
The Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in West Bengal to update the 2026 voters' list has sparked political tension. Evidently, it is a BJP-backed bid to disenfranchise minorities
apicture Isaac Gomes
03 Nov 2025
Migrants form the invisible backbone of India's cities, yet they remain politically voiceless and socially excluded. They are denied fair housing, healthcare, and even voting rights, written out of In
apicture Fr. John Felix Raj & Prabhat Kumar Datta
03 Nov 2025
Once a Modi admirer, Sonam Wangchuk now languishes in jail under the National Security Act. The people of Ladakh, once promised empowerment, are silenced, jobless, and disenfranchised. They were betra
apicture Chhotebhai
03 Nov 2025
The Taj Mahal, a timeless symbol of love, is now a target of hate-fueled revisionism. Despite overwhelming historical evidence, right-wing propaganda persists in recasting it as a Hindu temple.
apicture Ram Puniyani
03 Nov 2025
Trump missed the Nobel Peace Prize, for which he had ardently longed, making no secret of it and loudly claiming he had prevented 7 wars. The fact remains that he has been supporting the inhumanity of
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
03 Nov 2025
I am in for correction. With a word like 'reaction,' we have no power to stop in the middle. We have to see things through to the very end. Moreover, it never works alone but in a chain. Reaction cann
apicture P. Raja
03 Nov 2025
From Harappa's drainage to Hampi's aqueducts, India once built cities in harmony with nature and purpose. Today's chaotic urban sprawl betrays that legacy. A single monsoon is enough today to expose t
apicture Pachu Menon
03 Nov 2025