Temple vs Tapasya

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
16 Jan 2023
Union Home Minister Amit Shah announced that the Ram temple at Ayodhya would be opened on January 1 next year.

In the late forties when the question of the reconstruction of Somnath temple came up, Gandhiji told Sardar Patel and others that he was in favour of rebuilding the temple, but it should not be done with government funds. It has to be undertaken wholly with private funds, Gandhiji was emphatic about it. When the time for its inauguration came, President Rajendra Prasad was invited to do that honour. He consulted Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru who dissuaded the former from it. Nehru told the President: “My dear Rajendra Babu, I confess that I do not like the idea of your associating yourself with a spectacular opening of the Somnath Temple. This is not merely visiting a temple, which can certainly be done by you or anyone else, but rather participating in a significant function which unfortunately has a number of implications.” Nehru was highlighting the principle of separating state form religion. It is another matter that the President later attended the inauguration of the temple. 

Cut to the present era. Addressing a public meeting in Tripura, which is going to polls in a month or two, Union Home Minister Amit Shah announced that the Ram temple at Ayodhya would be opened on January 1 next year. It is appalling that the announcement came neither from the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra, which is overseeing the temple construction, nor any religious leader associated with it. It is equally important to recall that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the master of ceremonies and the official yajmaan during the Bhumi Pujan ceremony of the temple in 2020. The Modi government has travelled miles and miles from the Nehru government which had the principle of separation of state from religion as one of its core agenda. With the BJP, apparently under the tutelage of the Sangh Parivar, coming to power, such niceties and distinctions have vanished into thin air.   

Juxtapose this ostentatious and brazen politicization of religion with Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s unambiguous announcement that Bharat Jodo Yatra is not for political gain, but it is a ‘tapasya’ meant to fight hate, fear, disharmony and division of the society on caste and religious lines. Religion and its associated rituals make the ‘highway’ to people’s hearts. It is the easiest and surest method to exploit the ordinary mortals and manoeuvre the gullible public to garner votes. Rahul Gandhi’s Tapasya may or may not bring in political dividends. But, at a time when the country is in the thick of religious and caste upheavals; when religious fundamentalists and fanatics clamour for a Hindu Rashtra; when the main religious minorities are threatened with annihilation, the yatra for unity and harmony sends out its message loud and clear. 

The negativity of politicising religion has to be countered by the positivity of Rahul Gandhi’s call for tapasya. The country needs politicians who desist from cashing in on the naivety of people. As the BJP enters the final year of its second term in the Centre, tide seems to have turned against it. The party is frantically searching for a vote-catching ‘achievement’ that would catapult it to power again. What better means than ‘temple politics’ to garner votes. But such short-cuts to power would do colossal damage to the country. Rahul’s Tapasya route, on the other hand, would be the ideal path to keep the nation united.

Recent Posts

The Iranian war is a story of how greed, nations, leaders and alliances shape global conflict. A troubling question is also raised simultaneously: has India's once-independent foreign policy been repl
apicture A. J. Philip
09 Mar 2026
The 2026 Budget Session erupted as Rahul Gandhi was repeatedly blocked from citing MM Naravane's memoir, triggering suspensions and a no-confidence move against Om Birla. Gandhi accused Narendra Modi
apicture G Ramachandram
09 Mar 2026
Across India, ordinary citizens are pushing back against the rising hate speech and discrimination, defending minorities and upholding constitutional values. From solidarity protests to everyday acts
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
09 Mar 2026
Civil marriages under the Special Marriage Act once enabled interfaith and intercaste unions beyond religious barriers. New proposals like Gujarat's parental consent rule threaten adult autonomy, rais
apicture John Dayal
09 Mar 2026
The Supreme Court swiftly acted when a textbook questioned the judiciary. But what about broader NCERT revisions aimed at reshaping history and civic understanding? As ideological edits accumulate, a
apicture Oliver D'Souza
09 Mar 2026
India's empowerment narrative celebrates only "professional" success while overlooking the unpaid labour of millions of homemakers, who sustain families and the economy. Recognising domestic work as r
apicture Jaswant Kaur
09 Mar 2026
The Allahabad High Court reaffirmed that caste is determined by birth and remains unchanged by conversion or marriage. The ruling revives the larger constitutional debate: if caste persists after conv
apicture Jessy Kurian
09 Mar 2026
Your third stage Is discrimination, The tightening of rules Around the necks of the Dalit castes.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
09 Mar 2026
The tragic accident involving Sahil Dhaneshra, a 23-year-old youth brimming with promise, a wall adorned with medals, and the inconsolable anguish of a mother, has shaken the nation and compelled us t
apicture Richa Walia
09 Mar 2026
Indian men are extremely safety-conscious. We are so concerned about women's safety that we have decided the safest place for them is inside a cage designed entirely by us.
apicture Robert Clements
09 Mar 2026