Temple vs Tapasya

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
16 Jan 2023
Union Home Minister Amit Shah announced that the Ram temple at Ayodhya would be opened on January 1 next year.

In the late forties when the question of the reconstruction of Somnath temple came up, Gandhiji told Sardar Patel and others that he was in favour of rebuilding the temple, but it should not be done with government funds. It has to be undertaken wholly with private funds, Gandhiji was emphatic about it. When the time for its inauguration came, President Rajendra Prasad was invited to do that honour. He consulted Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru who dissuaded the former from it. Nehru told the President: “My dear Rajendra Babu, I confess that I do not like the idea of your associating yourself with a spectacular opening of the Somnath Temple. This is not merely visiting a temple, which can certainly be done by you or anyone else, but rather participating in a significant function which unfortunately has a number of implications.” Nehru was highlighting the principle of separating state form religion. It is another matter that the President later attended the inauguration of the temple. 

Cut to the present era. Addressing a public meeting in Tripura, which is going to polls in a month or two, Union Home Minister Amit Shah announced that the Ram temple at Ayodhya would be opened on January 1 next year. It is appalling that the announcement came neither from the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra, which is overseeing the temple construction, nor any religious leader associated with it. It is equally important to recall that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the master of ceremonies and the official yajmaan during the Bhumi Pujan ceremony of the temple in 2020. The Modi government has travelled miles and miles from the Nehru government which had the principle of separation of state from religion as one of its core agenda. With the BJP, apparently under the tutelage of the Sangh Parivar, coming to power, such niceties and distinctions have vanished into thin air.   

Juxtapose this ostentatious and brazen politicization of religion with Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s unambiguous announcement that Bharat Jodo Yatra is not for political gain, but it is a ‘tapasya’ meant to fight hate, fear, disharmony and division of the society on caste and religious lines. Religion and its associated rituals make the ‘highway’ to people’s hearts. It is the easiest and surest method to exploit the ordinary mortals and manoeuvre the gullible public to garner votes. Rahul Gandhi’s Tapasya may or may not bring in political dividends. But, at a time when the country is in the thick of religious and caste upheavals; when religious fundamentalists and fanatics clamour for a Hindu Rashtra; when the main religious minorities are threatened with annihilation, the yatra for unity and harmony sends out its message loud and clear. 

The negativity of politicising religion has to be countered by the positivity of Rahul Gandhi’s call for tapasya. The country needs politicians who desist from cashing in on the naivety of people. As the BJP enters the final year of its second term in the Centre, tide seems to have turned against it. The party is frantically searching for a vote-catching ‘achievement’ that would catapult it to power again. What better means than ‘temple politics’ to garner votes. But such short-cuts to power would do colossal damage to the country. Rahul’s Tapasya route, on the other hand, would be the ideal path to keep the nation united.

Recent Posts

From emperors kneeling in penance to a president posturing as the Saviour, Trump's attacks on the Pope expose a reckless inversion of moral order.
apicture A. J. Philip
20 Apr 2026
The US-Israel attack on Iran marks a dangerous breach of international law driven by power, exposing the erosion of global norms, India's diplomatic missteps, and the perils of unchecked militarism th
apicture G Ramachandram
20 Apr 2026
The Vande Mataram row is less about patriotism than power, where enforced symbolism risks redefining nationalism as conformity to the majority religion. It undermines India's plural identity and its c
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
20 Apr 2026
Framed as welfare, the proposed Christian Board risks masking rights violations, expanding state control, and fragmenting vulnerable communities. It substitutes justice with management while sidelinin
apicture John Dayal
20 Apr 2026
New Delhi, April 14, 2026: In the backdrop of several ongoing conflicts and wars across the world, the Catholic Bishops' Conference of India (CBCI), through its Office for Dialogue and Desk for Ecumen
apicture Dr Anthoniraj Thumma
20 Apr 2026
The TCS Nashik case exposes a deeper truth: workplace harassment is not an exception but a systemic failure often hidden behind reputation, weak enforcement, and fear of retaliation—where silence is i
apicture Jaswant Kaur
20 Apr 2026
Pigs are now being weaponised as instruments of provocation, turning faith into hostility and everyday life into intimidation. Such tactics deepen segregation, normalise humiliation, and signal how ea
apicture Ram Puniyani
20 Apr 2026
Ambedkar was not just a social reformer but also a visionary economist, linking currency stability, industrialisation, and labour rights to social justice while exposing caste as an economic barrier.
apicture Dr J. Felix Raj
20 Apr 2026
The shock was not the new insult, but the contrast. Having once breathed as an equal, he could no longer accept the air of slavery.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
20 Apr 2026
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the children of God" (The Gospel according to Matthew 5:9)
apicture Dr Jude Nirmal Doss
20 Apr 2026