Temple vs Tapasya

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
16 Jan 2023
Union Home Minister Amit Shah announced that the Ram temple at Ayodhya would be opened on January 1 next year.

In the late forties when the question of the reconstruction of Somnath temple came up, Gandhiji told Sardar Patel and others that he was in favour of rebuilding the temple, but it should not be done with government funds. It has to be undertaken wholly with private funds, Gandhiji was emphatic about it. When the time for its inauguration came, President Rajendra Prasad was invited to do that honour. He consulted Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru who dissuaded the former from it. Nehru told the President: “My dear Rajendra Babu, I confess that I do not like the idea of your associating yourself with a spectacular opening of the Somnath Temple. This is not merely visiting a temple, which can certainly be done by you or anyone else, but rather participating in a significant function which unfortunately has a number of implications.” Nehru was highlighting the principle of separating state form religion. It is another matter that the President later attended the inauguration of the temple. 

Cut to the present era. Addressing a public meeting in Tripura, which is going to polls in a month or two, Union Home Minister Amit Shah announced that the Ram temple at Ayodhya would be opened on January 1 next year. It is appalling that the announcement came neither from the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra, which is overseeing the temple construction, nor any religious leader associated with it. It is equally important to recall that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the master of ceremonies and the official yajmaan during the Bhumi Pujan ceremony of the temple in 2020. The Modi government has travelled miles and miles from the Nehru government which had the principle of separation of state from religion as one of its core agenda. With the BJP, apparently under the tutelage of the Sangh Parivar, coming to power, such niceties and distinctions have vanished into thin air.   

Juxtapose this ostentatious and brazen politicization of religion with Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s unambiguous announcement that Bharat Jodo Yatra is not for political gain, but it is a ‘tapasya’ meant to fight hate, fear, disharmony and division of the society on caste and religious lines. Religion and its associated rituals make the ‘highway’ to people’s hearts. It is the easiest and surest method to exploit the ordinary mortals and manoeuvre the gullible public to garner votes. Rahul Gandhi’s Tapasya may or may not bring in political dividends. But, at a time when the country is in the thick of religious and caste upheavals; when religious fundamentalists and fanatics clamour for a Hindu Rashtra; when the main religious minorities are threatened with annihilation, the yatra for unity and harmony sends out its message loud and clear. 

The negativity of politicising religion has to be countered by the positivity of Rahul Gandhi’s call for tapasya. The country needs politicians who desist from cashing in on the naivety of people. As the BJP enters the final year of its second term in the Centre, tide seems to have turned against it. The party is frantically searching for a vote-catching ‘achievement’ that would catapult it to power again. What better means than ‘temple politics’ to garner votes. But such short-cuts to power would do colossal damage to the country. Rahul’s Tapasya route, on the other hand, would be the ideal path to keep the nation united.

Recent Posts

Journalism is not glamour, wealth, or security—it is madness, duty, and passion. Reporters run into burning towers, face raging floods, or remain in war zones like Gaza, compelled to witness and recor
apicture A. J. Philip
01 Sep 2025
We don't need the Supreme Court to tell us how to help "strays" in our society. Our conscience should suffice. By all means, do look after stray dogs, but don't miss the wood for the trees. There is n
apicture Chhotebhai
01 Sep 2025
Abhishek Manu Singhvi told the Supreme Court that governors cannot act as "Super Chief Ministers." Their role is bound by ministerial advice, and meant only to facilitate lawmaking—never to stall demo
apicture Joseph Maliakan
01 Sep 2025
In a Goa overrun by tourism and eroding traditions, Maendra Alvares' Big Foot stands as a living chronicle of heritage. Blending art, history, faith, and ecology, his work embodies true 'Goaness'—a pa
apicture Pachu Menon
01 Sep 2025
Avay Shukla's biting satire exposes bulldozer justice, media capture, and the cult of the "Top Leader." With humour and history, he warns that democracy risks shrinking into spectacle, fear, and impun
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
01 Sep 2025
Soon, India will proudly tell the world: we are a land where education is irrelevant, but identity is everything. Where bridges may collapse, planes may crash, hospitals may kill, but don't worry—as l
apicture Robert Clements
01 Sep 2025
The Supreme Court's interim order on Bihar's voter deletions has restored some faith in democracy. The order purportedly safeguards the citizens' right to vote by mandating transparency, Aadhaar accep
apicture Joseph Maliakan
25 Aug 2025
Journalists who once shaped national narratives now face penury in retirement. Unlike politicians, judges, or bureaucrats, they are left abandoned, denied pensions, health care, or dignity. After a li
apicture A. J. Philip
25 Aug 2025
From battling caste oppression in the 1800s to shaping modern India's education system, Christian contributions have been monumental in transforming the society. Yet today, Christians face hostility a
apicture Jijo Thomas Placheril
25 Aug 2025
The BJP's harsher anti-conversion laws aim to push minorities toward second-class citizenship. Without credible evidence of "demographic change," these draconian measures reveal a deeper agenda: advan
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
25 Aug 2025