The Troubling Implications of PM in CJI's House

Fr. Gaurav Nair Fr. Gaurav Nair
16 Sep 2024

The viral images of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud side by side at a puja on Ganesh Chaturthi have sent shockwaves through the legal fraternity and citizens. While this may have appeared to be a personal event, the implications go far beyond. The executive and the judiciary playing bedfellows strikes at the heart of constitutional values—particularly the principle of the separation of powers.

The judiciary serves as an impartial arbiter, upholding the Constitution and checking the executive and legislative powers. The principle of separation of powers is enshrined in the Constitution. Article 50 mandates the State to separate the judiciary from the executive. This is the bedrock of public faith in the judiciary's independence and ability to deliver justice impartially.

When judges are seen in close personal interaction with political leaders, it sends a dangerous signal. Such interactions birth suspicions about the impartiality of past, present and future judgments. It is not without substance that Sanjay Raut of Shiv Sena (UBT) has called for the CJI to back off from making a judgement in Maharashtra. In a country where trust in institutions is already fragile, actions compromising the perception of independence have a lasting impact.

It is no secret that post-retirement positions for judges have always been contentious. Several retired judges have been appointed to commissions, tribunals, or political positions. It is concerning as judges might tailor their decisions to secure favourable engagements. This meeting, just two months before the CJI's retirement, has led to widespread speculation.

This incident cannot be viewed in isolation. There has been a growing concern over the judiciary's inaction in sanctioning the BJP's polarising actions. The judiciary has often failed to hold the government accountable on key issues, from electoral bonds to hate speech. Instead of taking a firm stance, the judiciary has allowed these matters to fester, leaving a vacuum filled by the ruling party with its own narrative.

This is further compounded by its failure to bring justice in cases involving right-wing violence. CJI Chandrachud was part of the bench that presided over the Ayodhya verdict, which ultimately handed over the disputed land to the Hindus. The judgment visibly sidestepped justice for the victims. The perpetrators, part of the Sangh Parivar, walked free. The decision was met with widespread dismay among those who expected the judiciary to deliver justice in one of India's most divisive conflicts.

Some argue that such interactions between the judiciary and the executive have historical precedents. However, these past transgressions cannot serve as a justification for continuing such practices. In fact, these instances should serve as warnings of the dangers posed when the judiciary allows itself to be drawn into the orbit of the executive. In a time of heightened political tension, religious polarisation, and increasing attacks on minorities, the judiciary's independence is more crucial than ever.

The public's disappointment is palpable. Many had hoped the CJI would stand as a beacon of judicial independence. This event has cast a long shadow over his legacy. It is a reminder that public trust in the judiciary can be undermined instantly by actions that suggest undue proximity to the executive.

Recent Posts

As the majority of India's population lives in rural areas, air pollution in these areas cannot be ignored, and pollution cannot be attributed solely to traffic exhaust, factory emissions, and constru
apicture Dr Manoj Kumar Mishra
09 Jun 2025
If our democracy still holds true to its constitutional promises, the Supreme Court must intervene to undo this grave wrong. After all, the apex court has a proud legacy of standing up for the rights
apicture A. J. Philip
09 Jun 2025
The Court further ordered that Chouhan be provided with the telephone numbers of the SHO and the beat constable of the area within whose territorial jurisdiction he lives. "As and when any message or
apicture Joseph Maliakan
09 Jun 2025
Christians in India face rising harassment, especially nuns accused of conversion while travelling. The Church must address this hostility with legal support, advocacy, and awareness initiatives. True
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
09 Jun 2025
As a unique characteristic that reflects its harmonious coexistence of various cultures, languages, religions, and traditions across its vast geographical expanse, the country's 'unity in diversity' c
apicture Pachu Menon
09 Jun 2025
Buddhist monks protesting the Mahabodhi Temple's Brahmanisation is the story of the struggle between Buddhism's egalitarianism and Brahmanism's hierarchy, which seeks to suppress others and create pow
apicture Ram Puniyani
09 Jun 2025
In a team sport like cricket, greatness is measured not only by individual excellence but also by other factors, such as leadership, that are integral to the success of a team. Tendulkar was an absolu
apicture Mathew John
09 Jun 2025
India faces a key moment where education can either bridge opportunity gaps or deepen inequality. While institutions like IITs showcase excellence, systemic neglect leaves millions behind. Reform dema
apicture Dr John Singarayar
09 Jun 2025
Those who died, died without knowing better, because experience and time may not have revealed the truth to them. But to you who have aged and still believe, take your blindfolds off, or one day you'l
apicture Robert Clements
09 Jun 2025
Whatever may be your personal beliefs, your commitment is to protect the Constitution in all respects. And it mandates you to be just and fair to one and all—tribals, non-tribals, Christians, Muslims,
apicture A. J. Philip
02 Jun 2025