The Troubling Implications of PM in CJI's House

Fr. Gaurav Nair Fr. Gaurav Nair
16 Sep 2024

The viral images of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud side by side at a puja on Ganesh Chaturthi have sent shockwaves through the legal fraternity and citizens. While this may have appeared to be a personal event, the implications go far beyond. The executive and the judiciary playing bedfellows strikes at the heart of constitutional values—particularly the principle of the separation of powers.

The judiciary serves as an impartial arbiter, upholding the Constitution and checking the executive and legislative powers. The principle of separation of powers is enshrined in the Constitution. Article 50 mandates the State to separate the judiciary from the executive. This is the bedrock of public faith in the judiciary's independence and ability to deliver justice impartially.

When judges are seen in close personal interaction with political leaders, it sends a dangerous signal. Such interactions birth suspicions about the impartiality of past, present and future judgments. It is not without substance that Sanjay Raut of Shiv Sena (UBT) has called for the CJI to back off from making a judgement in Maharashtra. In a country where trust in institutions is already fragile, actions compromising the perception of independence have a lasting impact.

It is no secret that post-retirement positions for judges have always been contentious. Several retired judges have been appointed to commissions, tribunals, or political positions. It is concerning as judges might tailor their decisions to secure favourable engagements. This meeting, just two months before the CJI's retirement, has led to widespread speculation.

This incident cannot be viewed in isolation. There has been a growing concern over the judiciary's inaction in sanctioning the BJP's polarising actions. The judiciary has often failed to hold the government accountable on key issues, from electoral bonds to hate speech. Instead of taking a firm stance, the judiciary has allowed these matters to fester, leaving a vacuum filled by the ruling party with its own narrative.

This is further compounded by its failure to bring justice in cases involving right-wing violence. CJI Chandrachud was part of the bench that presided over the Ayodhya verdict, which ultimately handed over the disputed land to the Hindus. The judgment visibly sidestepped justice for the victims. The perpetrators, part of the Sangh Parivar, walked free. The decision was met with widespread dismay among those who expected the judiciary to deliver justice in one of India's most divisive conflicts.

Some argue that such interactions between the judiciary and the executive have historical precedents. However, these past transgressions cannot serve as a justification for continuing such practices. In fact, these instances should serve as warnings of the dangers posed when the judiciary allows itself to be drawn into the orbit of the executive. In a time of heightened political tension, religious polarisation, and increasing attacks on minorities, the judiciary's independence is more crucial than ever.

The public's disappointment is palpable. Many had hoped the CJI would stand as a beacon of judicial independence. This event has cast a long shadow over his legacy. It is a reminder that public trust in the judiciary can be undermined instantly by actions that suggest undue proximity to the executive.

Recent Posts

The Emergency must be remembered, not as a tool to target a political party but as a lesson against authoritarian excess. Yet, we cannot ignore that worse violations of democratic norms and human righ
apicture A. J. Philip
30 Jun 2025
Fifty years later, India faces a chilling déjà vu with an 'undeclared' Emergency. Freedom of speech is stifled, dissent is suppressed, and institutions are compromised. True democracy demands resistan
apicture Cedric Prakash
30 Jun 2025
Amit Shah's claim that those who speak English will be ashamed evidences that the BJP-RSS is trying to bring down the populace and push India into another Vedic dark age where ignorance and superstiti
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
30 Jun 2025
The NSE's ?1,400 crore settlement with SEBI raises critical concerns about India's financial markets. Any perceived regulatory capture risks eroding trust.
apicture Jaswant Kaur
30 Jun 2025
Christian education in India has had a profound influence on democracy and social justice in the country. It played a pivotal role in challenging caste oppression, promoting inclusivity, and fostering
apicture Fr Soroj Mullick, SDB
30 Jun 2025
"The spread of digital culture, particularly evident among young people, is profoundly changing their experience of space and time; it influences their daily activities, communication, and interperson
apicture Joe Eruppakkatt
30 Jun 2025
Welcome to the Happy State of Emergency: Where freedom is carefully curated, minds are pre-cooked, and Big Brother doesn't need to frown—he just raises one eyebrow... and we salute…!
apicture Robert Clements
30 Jun 2025
The North-South divide reflects India's broader regional and cultural tensions. The progress of Southern states in health, education, and development contrasts with the Hindi belt's struggles on devel
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
23 Jun 2025
India's 2027 census and ensuing delimitation will redefine its political landscape. As northern states gain influence due to burgeoning population, southern states will face reduced representation des
apicture Dr John Singarayar
23 Jun 2025
For India to become a global healthcare power, it must democratise medical education—revise outdated rules, invest in public institutions, expand seats, embrace technology, and ensure affordability. A
apicture A. J. Philip
23 Jun 2025