A stare-down from India! I didn't get my hands on the God Bless The USA Bible because you seem to presume and assume God has an exclusive subscription just for your country. Who exactly is supposed to ring the bell and remind you that there isn't one God for America and another for the rest of the world? The same God who created Iran, Palestine, India, China, and every other nation created you, too. No special edition, no VIP access, no divine subscription. However, I know the Bible is your favourite book, and you have claimed its influence in your life.

Given the recent turn of events, it is baffling to note that your decision to launch 'Operation Midnight Hammer' stemmed from your 'feeling' that they were going to attack first. Besides the fact that you created history by starting a war based on 'vibes,' you have also created a horrible precedent. Four days after the attack on the girls' school, namely The Good Tree in Minab, the Pentagon chief, Pete Hegseth, casually acknowledged that they were investigating the 'incident.' For your information, it wasn't an 'incident' but 'killings.'

Look at the society you've created with crazy, distorted, depressed and worn-out minds such as Nikolas Cruz, Dimitrios Pagourtzis and many more. Are you competent enough to advise? According to CNN's analysis, in 2025 alone, there were at least 78 shootings with 32 killed and 122 injured. How pathetic!

Your aversion to and denunciation of certain media houses do not rule out their reports as 'lies.' If a media house can repeatedly spread falsehoods about you and still thrive without consequence, it raises one of two possibilities: either the power you sway is zilch, or the reports may not be false after all. Sadly, your country is notoriously known for the highest number of school shootings in the world.

I cannot help but think that attacking a primary school is THE highest level of maliciousness and sadism. Just because perversion is at its peak in your nation, where school kids kill and get killed, do not try this in other countries. It is visible to the world that you have diluted and devastated the very foundation on which the UN was founded. Not only do you treat the UN like your lap dog, but you also force other countries to stop being members of the UN and its other affiliated organisations. Again, this would mean disharmony and a state of global belligerence.

Right from inventing the first nuclear bomb to proudly detonating it in the so-called "Trinity" test, the audacity of invoking a sacred word for a weapon designed to annihilate humanity was apparently not enough irony. As if that demonstration didn't convince your predecessor of the scale of destruction a nuclear bomb could unleash, he went ahead and dropped two of them on Hiroshima and Nagasaki less than a month later.

Dropping one bomb did not seem enough. He dropped two, two days apart, almost as if the first catastrophe needed a sequel to ensure the entire world understood who the unruly, unhinged "big brother" really was. Hiroshima and the rest of the world had barely begun to reckon with the horror of "Little Boy" when, as though devastation required a technical upgrade, America's pervert leadership decided to follow it with the more advanced "Fat Man" over Nagasaki.

Don't you think names "Little Boy" and "Fat Man" themselves carry a grotesque casualness that borders on the surreal? Whoever thought them appropriate managed to wrap instruments of mass annihilation in language so flippant it would make even Lucifer blush with embarrassment.

The command had two long days to pause and reflect after committing the world's most unforgivable war crime. The reckless decision and evil design of America's so-called democracy was to press forward and prove the point again. If there is anything more vicious than perfecting a weapon capable of destroying every living thing and then choosing to use it twice, in the span of forty-eight hours, it is hard to imagine what that might be.

If one of your inhumane predecessors could simply overlook the UN Charter signed in San Francisco on June 26, 1945, by fifty nations and still go on to commit an irreversible act of terror against Japan, then one might reasonably conclude that the United Nations was created largely to sit back and watch while you did as you pleased. Today, you may justify the act by arguing that the United Nations did not formally come into existence until October 24, 1945. But that reasoning falls apart quickly. The UN Charter had already been drafted and signed months earlier. Your predecessor knew exactly what principles it contained. You, as President, cannot brush off history and act as if your country is great and deserving of praise.

One might imagine that witnessing the devastation of those bombs would have produced, at the very least, a moment of moral clarity, perhaps even the birth of the world's strongest anti-nuclear advocate. But that would have required humility. Instead, the distinction remains intact: the first nation to build them, the first to test them, and still the only nation to have used nuclear weapons in combat.

So perhaps the appropriate legacy isn't pride or strategic justification to continue to boss or threaten, but a permanent shame and obligation, regardless of which leadership sits in power to spend the rest of its time apologising to the world for having demonstrated, in the most catastrophic way possible, just how far human ingenuity can go when guided by pure hubris rather than conscience.

I doubt if you have the IQ to understand that if any nation on earth is eminently qualified to speak with moral authority about nuclear non-proliferation, it is Japan. It endured the unimaginable, yet chose to rebuild itself not as a monument to vengeance but as a symbol of restraint and peace. From that devastation emerged a country that understands, in the most intimate way possible, what nuclear weapons truly mean. The same moral authority cannot be claimed by the USA. You have zero standing to lecture others about restraint.

History does not forget who crossed that line first. And your dismal record does not begin or end there. Don't feign ignorance and strut around with sermons and a fake morality. The very foundations of your country were laid through conquest, thousands and thousands of battles against the natives, displacement, and bloodshed, long before the atomic age arrived.

Who policed your morality when you carried out the Sand Creek and Wounded Knee massacres? You have blood on your hands. Call yourselves "saints," "pilgrims," "separatists," or "puritans," but remember you secretly fled from a land where you were considered criminals and threats. You ran away only to kill, loot, and plunder the new land you found, never intending to live in harmony.

Roughly a dozen years after the chaos you unleashed in Japan, your country decided it was time to establish the International Atomic Energy Agency, apparently out of a sudden concern that nuclear weapons might be dangerous in the wrong hands, any hands other than yours. You strongly doubted and feared that someone else was planning to strike back. Raised in a deeply religious household and as one who often invoked faith as the foundation of freedom, Dwight D. Eisenhower certainly knew the biblical warning: "All who take the sword will perish by the sword."

The IAEA itself has repeatedly stated that it has found no evidence of a structured Iranian program to build nuclear weapons. Likewise, decades ago, the CIA's chief weapons inspector in Iraq concluded that the search for weapons of mass destruction had "gone as far as feasible" and found nothing, thereby closing the very investigation that had been used to justify the 2003 invasion. Long before that came the 1953 coup in Iran, another reminder that "defending freedom" has often had remarkably convenient geopolitical timing.

When the evidence repeatedly refuses to cooperate with your highly imaginative narrative, what exactly drives your urgency to intervene? Your explanations are usually noble, such as liberating women, defending democracy and protecting world peace. And yet the destinations of this sudden concern for freedom seem curiously consistent: regions rich in oil and strategic influence.

When help arrives in the form of bombs, ammunition, sanctions, and regime changes, it starts to look less like altruism and more like a very persistent habit of offering unsolicited "assistance" to places whose resources just happen to be extremely valuable. So, Trump, mind your own business and work on your cognitive abilities, if any.