hidden image

PM-SHRI Used to Strongarm States

Joseph Maliakan Joseph Maliakan
27 Oct 2025

The Union Education Ministry is using the Pradhan Mantri Schools for Rising India (PM-SHRI) fund to arm-twist states into accepting the controversial National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. The PM SHRI was introduced in 2022-23 and is to continue through 2026-27, that is, for five years.

According to the 'vision statement,' the scheme, launched on September 7, 2022, is intended to develop more than 14,500 PM-SHRI schools in which every student feels welcomed and cared for, where a safe and stimulating learning environment exists, where a wide range of learning experiences are offered, and where good physical infrastructure and appropriate resources conducive to learning are available to all students.

More than 20 lakh students were expected to be the direct beneficiaries of the scheme. It would nurture students in a way that they become engaged, productive and contributing citizens for building an equitable, inclusive and plural society, "as envisaged by the National Education Policy 2020."

These schools would help showcase the implementation of the National Education Policy 2020 and emerge as exemplars. The school's dignity as an institution would be restored, and important dates, such as the school's foundation day, would be celebrated with the community. The list of distinguished alumni would be displayed and honoured.

The schools would focus not only on enhancing cognitive development but also on creating holistic, well-rounded individuals equipped with key 21st-century skills. The focus would be on each child's learning outcomes in every grade. Assessment at all levels would be based on conceptual understanding, the application of knowledge to real-life situations, and competency.

When the scheme was announced by the Union Education Ministry in September the opposition ruled states, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Punjab and Delhi refused to implement it because acceptance of the scheme involved two things, first agreeing to enforce the provisions of the controversial National Education Policy 2020 arbitrarily formulated by the Union Education Ministry without due consultation with the states or discussion in the Parliament. Second, schools selected under the scheme were required to prominently display the PM-SHRI logo.

Education, as is well known, is a subject in the Concurrent list. While the states are free to legislate on education in accordance with the regional needs and aspirations of the people, any legislation on education enacted by the Union government will have to be passed fairly after consultations with the state governments and the various political parties represented in Parliament.

Most opposition parties opposed several provisions of the National Education Policy 2020, announced at the peak of COVID-19, without any consultation with the states or other stakeholders.

When the NEP 2020 was announced, opposition parties like the Trinamool Congress (TMC) and the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM) opposed it on the grounds that it violated the fundamental values enshrined in the constitution, such as secularism, democracy, and socialism. The CPM had particularly opposed the NEP 2020, arguing that it would lead to the commercialisation and privatisation of education in the country, thereby further alienating and marginalising the poor.

The opposition also argued that the emphasis in the NEP 202 on ancient Indian knowledge systems will adversely affect scientific thinking among the new generation and encourage students to believe in superstitions and myths. The proposal to do away with the study of the Mughal period in Indian history would erase almost 400 years of Indian history, as various historians have pointed out.

Introduction of the PM-SHRI in state schools would lead to further centralisation of education. Ultimately, the Union government would have complete control over education, including the selection of textbooks, the appointment of teachers, the formulation of syllabi, and the holding of examinations. All would be controlled and managed by the Union Education Ministry or other Central organisations under its purview. This will, as already witnessed in BJP-ruled states, further distort history, as textbooks have been arbitrarily changed.

Under the scheme, 14,500 schools across the country are to be brought under it over the five years from 2021-22 to 2025-26: 13,070 Government schools, 913 Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan schools, and 620 Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti schools.

Despite earlier opposition, the Kerala government on Thursday, October 23, signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Union government for the PM-SHRI. The decision came notwithstanding opposition from the Communist Party of India (CPI), the second-largest partner in the opposition alliance.

The change of heart came following the withholding of ?1500 crore under the Samagra Shiksha Keralam (SSK) by the Union government, it is learnt. Following the signing of the MoU under PM SHRI, the money will be released to Kerala!

Other opposition-ruled states, like Tamil Nadu and West Bengal, however, have refused to accept the PM-SHRI and the NEP even in the face of financial arm-twisting by the Union Government. The Union government has withheld ?10,447 crores meant for Tamil Nadu between 2018 and 2024. The Union government has also withheld ?1,745 crores meant for West Bengal for just one year, 2024-25, for not accepting the PM-SHRI!

Recent Posts

On April 9, I was in Karnal as a resource person at the 2026 Delhi Province Assembly of the Indian Missionary Society (IMS), an indigenous order of the Catholic Church. One thing that attracted me to
apicture A. J. Philip
13 Apr 2026
The proposed FCRA Amendment Bill, 2026, has sparked fears that expanded state powers to seize NGO assets may bypass constitutional safeguards, disproportionately affect minority institutions, and shri
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
13 Apr 2026
A comforting myth of Congress–Christian affinity masks a harder truth: when justice required administrative fixes, the state acted; when it demanded constitutional courage for Dalit Christians, it hes
apicture John Dayal
13 Apr 2026
The Supreme Court of India affirmed marriage as a partnership of equals, ruling that a wife's refusal to perform chores is not cruelty. By declaring "wife is a life partner, not a maid," it reinforces
apicture Jessy Kurian
13 Apr 2026
Public Interest Litigation transformed access to justice in India, empowering courts to defend the marginalised. As calls to curb it emerge, the debate centres on balancing concerns about misuse with
apicture Joseph Maliakan
13 Apr 2026
Amid the fallout from the Iran war, India's LPG shortage exposes a widening gap between official assurances and lived reality—fuel scarcity, rising prices, and migrant distress reveal a fragile energy
apicture Frank Krishner
13 Apr 2026
The Strait of Hormuz remains a volatile global lifeline, where Iran's "Hormuz Gambit" leverages geography to wield outsized influence—threatening energy flows, unsettling markets, and forcing major po
apicture Fr John Felix Raj & Dr Sovik Mukherjee
13 Apr 2026
In the muddy piece of a Hindu land, Where caste was stitched into human skin, And untouchability carried chains heavier than iron, A child was born beneath a fractured sky Not to inherit the Hindu
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
13 Apr 2026
Amid escalating Middle East conflicts, petrodollar power and Zionist geopolitics frame a world gripped by conflict, moral crisis, and competing national visions. Unchecked ambition, ideological absolu
apicture Peter Fernandes
13 Apr 2026
nobody calls a selfish person aunty with affection. That title, in our country at least, comes with invisible expectations. To care. To guide. To smile even when the knees protest.
apicture Robert Clements
13 Apr 2026