hidden image

PM-SHRI Used to Strongarm States

Joseph Maliakan Joseph Maliakan
27 Oct 2025

The Union Education Ministry is using the Pradhan Mantri Schools for Rising India (PM-SHRI) fund to arm-twist states into accepting the controversial National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. The PM SHRI was introduced in 2022-23 and is to continue through 2026-27, that is, for five years.

According to the 'vision statement,' the scheme, launched on September 7, 2022, is intended to develop more than 14,500 PM-SHRI schools in which every student feels welcomed and cared for, where a safe and stimulating learning environment exists, where a wide range of learning experiences are offered, and where good physical infrastructure and appropriate resources conducive to learning are available to all students.

More than 20 lakh students were expected to be the direct beneficiaries of the scheme. It would nurture students in a way that they become engaged, productive and contributing citizens for building an equitable, inclusive and plural society, "as envisaged by the National Education Policy 2020."

These schools would help showcase the implementation of the National Education Policy 2020 and emerge as exemplars. The school's dignity as an institution would be restored, and important dates, such as the school's foundation day, would be celebrated with the community. The list of distinguished alumni would be displayed and honoured.

The schools would focus not only on enhancing cognitive development but also on creating holistic, well-rounded individuals equipped with key 21st-century skills. The focus would be on each child's learning outcomes in every grade. Assessment at all levels would be based on conceptual understanding, the application of knowledge to real-life situations, and competency.

When the scheme was announced by the Union Education Ministry in September the opposition ruled states, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Punjab and Delhi refused to implement it because acceptance of the scheme involved two things, first agreeing to enforce the provisions of the controversial National Education Policy 2020 arbitrarily formulated by the Union Education Ministry without due consultation with the states or discussion in the Parliament. Second, schools selected under the scheme were required to prominently display the PM-SHRI logo.

Education, as is well known, is a subject in the Concurrent list. While the states are free to legislate on education in accordance with the regional needs and aspirations of the people, any legislation on education enacted by the Union government will have to be passed fairly after consultations with the state governments and the various political parties represented in Parliament.

Most opposition parties opposed several provisions of the National Education Policy 2020, announced at the peak of COVID-19, without any consultation with the states or other stakeholders.

When the NEP 2020 was announced, opposition parties like the Trinamool Congress (TMC) and the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM) opposed it on the grounds that it violated the fundamental values enshrined in the constitution, such as secularism, democracy, and socialism. The CPM had particularly opposed the NEP 2020, arguing that it would lead to the commercialisation and privatisation of education in the country, thereby further alienating and marginalising the poor.

The opposition also argued that the emphasis in the NEP 202 on ancient Indian knowledge systems will adversely affect scientific thinking among the new generation and encourage students to believe in superstitions and myths. The proposal to do away with the study of the Mughal period in Indian history would erase almost 400 years of Indian history, as various historians have pointed out.

Introduction of the PM-SHRI in state schools would lead to further centralisation of education. Ultimately, the Union government would have complete control over education, including the selection of textbooks, the appointment of teachers, the formulation of syllabi, and the holding of examinations. All would be controlled and managed by the Union Education Ministry or other Central organisations under its purview. This will, as already witnessed in BJP-ruled states, further distort history, as textbooks have been arbitrarily changed.

Under the scheme, 14,500 schools across the country are to be brought under it over the five years from 2021-22 to 2025-26: 13,070 Government schools, 913 Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan schools, and 620 Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti schools.

Despite earlier opposition, the Kerala government on Thursday, October 23, signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Union government for the PM-SHRI. The decision came notwithstanding opposition from the Communist Party of India (CPI), the second-largest partner in the opposition alliance.

The change of heart came following the withholding of ?1500 crore under the Samagra Shiksha Keralam (SSK) by the Union government, it is learnt. Following the signing of the MoU under PM SHRI, the money will be released to Kerala!

Other opposition-ruled states, like Tamil Nadu and West Bengal, however, have refused to accept the PM-SHRI and the NEP even in the face of financial arm-twisting by the Union Government. The Union government has withheld ?10,447 crores meant for Tamil Nadu between 2018 and 2024. The Union government has also withheld ?1,745 crores meant for West Bengal for just one year, 2024-25, for not accepting the PM-SHRI!

Recent Posts

From Socrates and Jesus to Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., history bears witness to the use of character assassination to silence dissent. In contemporary India, manufactured labels and personal at
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
02 Nov 2026
Rahul Gandhi has placed electoral integrity and constitutional democracy at the heart of national politics. But allegations and rallies cannot replace grassroots organisation. Unless the Congress stre
apicture John Dayal
02 Nov 2026
A doctor who abandoned urban comforts to serve impoverished tribal communities is now behind bars for allegedly standing with villagers resisting mining.
apicture A. J. Philip
02 Nov 2026
I am deeply concerned about the situation in our country and, equally, about the response—or the apparent lack of response—of our Christian communities. I write not to promote any political party or i
apicture Monsignor Susai Sebastian
02 Nov 2026
From Serbia's leaderless student movement to Brazil's resurgence, democracy draws strength from mobilisation, persistence and collective courage. These developments offer a vital lesson: lasting polit
apicture Joseph Maliakan
02 Nov 2026
Years of Indian training had taught me to approach a public toilet with caution and reluctant bravery. Before entering, the mind begins its negotiations: Can I hold it till home? Should I risk this? H
apicture Sujay Daniel, SJ
02 Nov 2026
These virtues tie us to humanity, link us with the divine, and make us responsible to and for one another. It implies and expects action. Compassion alone is not enough. We must act! To act, we need t
apicture Dr Mudita Menona Sodder
02 Nov 2026
The citizen continues supplying his phone number to buy socks, his birthday to order lunch, and his entire family history to recover a forgotten password. His privacy seems remarkably negotiable. Some
apicture Robert Clements
02 Nov 2026
Recall that Pope John Paul II came from Poland, a country that suffered much during the wars and between them, and Communism took away the little freedom they had. He himself suffered and witnessed th
apicture Stanislaus Alla
27 Oct 2026
India's youth and civil society are rallying under the tricolour to reclaim Democracy, challenge injustice, and defend rights. Despite arrests, barricades, and repression, a nationwide movement is gai
apicture Cedric Prakash
26 Oct 2026