hidden image

Strong-arm Measures will Misfire

DR. JOHN MOHAN RAZU DR. JOHN MOHAN RAZU
19 Jul 2021

The BJP is once again back with the agenda of curbing the growing population via state governments and Parliament. India stands next to China having more than one billion people. “Population Control” has been simmering in the past few years, but now it is gathering momentum as one of the BJP’s populist state governments justifying it saying that over-population impedes growth, prosperity and development. The context with which the push is being made should be taken into consideration as the elections are due in Uttar Pradesh in 2022, which is the largest state with the highest fertility rate. 

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath is a close ally of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah. This is not the first time we come across BJP pushing for the two-child norm. When Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister and emergency was clamped in mid-1970s, Sanjay Gandhi vociferously argued for population control and resorted to forced measures.   

Those who believe in population control invoke the Malthusian Theory of population which means that population grows at geometric proportions and food supply grows at arithmetic proportions. Thomas Edward Malthus was a famous 18th Century British economist known for outlining the population growth in his book published in 1798 titled An Essay on Principles of Population. He theorized that population would continue to expand until growth stopped or reversed by disease, calamity, famine, epidemic or other natural catastrophes.

Many dominant economists, policy-makers and political leaders view Malthusian theory as a realistic pointer to the prevalence of poverty and hunger; low GDP and per capita income. Thomas Malthus’ theory has now become a “reality”. Governments at the Centre for decades have been pointing out that India’s population is increasing at geometric proportions and food-supply is multiplying at arithmetic proportions.   

In such a scenario, they suggest two-child norm, family planning, methods that involve contraception and host of others. The developed and rich countries point out that over-population is the main factor for the ills of the people in poor and developing societies.

There are other reasons such as inequitable distribution of resources, policy paralysis, corruption, squandering of resources and widening of inequality. But they are addressed, rather concealed, and given different twists and turns. The poor and developing societies portray that the gravity of poverty and hunger is due to over-population. Over-population is the most important factor that impedes development process thereby stunting progress, prosperity and growth. 

A question that arises at this juncture is: how can more than a billion mouths be fed with limited and scarce resources? Let me offer a metaphor of a huge piece of land that can be shared among 500 people who can cultivate it and live well. If the same piece of land is distributed to 800 people, then their life becomes difficult. As people keep growing, the land gets shrunk – as many compete for the same piece of land. 

This is what Malthus said long ago from the perspective of economics/economy. Those who invoke birth control and introduce a bill on population control have nothing to do with Malthusian theory of population, but they have some other motive. Apart from UP, Assam and others also want to legislate on population control.  In line with it, the BJP MPs intend to introduce a Private Member’s Bill vis-à-vis Population Control which is likely to be tabled in the Upper House in the forthcoming session. 

Why have the BJP leaders all of a sudden woken up to the issue of population control? What should be the real motive behind this move? What is the politics behind it? Politics of religious majoritarianism thrives on stoking a particular religious community that outnumbers other communities. In addition, the ideologues and leaders are concerned about the future of the present majoritarian religious community which would be at stake if another dominant religious community is growing at a faster pace. 

Followers of Hindutva feel that if the trend is not checked it could outwit the current majority community. For them social demography is changing. In addition, percentage of the population of the Dalits and Tribals is also increasing. Notably, many Dalits have embraced Buddhism. 

More importantly, the infant mortality rate is the highest among the poor and the vulnerable when compared to others. In addition, coronavirus has exposed the appalling conditions of India’s Public Health System.  Politics of majoritarianism is now surfacing and has become the functional schema of far-right supporters.  

Therefore, to curb the growth of a religious community and to contain the growth of Dalits and Tribals, the right-wing fundamentalists are going all out. Further, the most down-trodden communities in India – Dalits, Tribals and others -- are still in the lowest socio-economic and educational indices. Paradoxically, in the year 2020 the Centre had told the Supreme Court that it opposed population control laws as they are counter-productive. 

Data available in recent times show that fertility rates of Hindus and Muslims have drastically come down. Likewise, population growth of these two communities shows a downward trend. Nonetheless, the Chief Minister of Assam, a BJP-ruled state, let the cat out of the bag saying that the demographic gap between the Hindus and the Muslims was narrowing. It is a known fact that coercion leads to demographic distortions; so many people wonder whether what is happening now is “narrative control” or “population control”?
 

Recent Posts

An organisation that claims to champion discipline, patriotism, and national regeneration should have little hesitation in embracing constitutional accountability. Transparency is not a threat to cred
apicture A. J. Philip
22 Jun 2026
Students today face unprecedented academic, emotional, and digital pressures. The answer lies not merely in better teaching techniques but in compassionate mentorship. Teachers who inspire trust, mode
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
22 Jun 2026
As the BJP consolidates power and the TMC splinters into rival camps, Mamata Banerjee's future hangs in the balance. Surrounded by rebels and rivals, she faces her gravest crisis—yet remains a leader
apicture John Dayal
22 Jun 2026
The national testing regime has become a costly annual drill that encourages rote learning, fuels corruption, enriches the coaching industry, and inflicts severe mental stress on millions of students,
apicture Joseph Maliakan
22 Jun 2026
The rise of the Cockroach Janata Party challenges the familiar "foreign hand" narrative, revealing instead a home-grown expression of youth frustration over unemployment, inequality, and political
apicture Pachu Menon
22 Jun 2026
The shrinking availability of migrant labour calls for a fundamental rethinking of labour policy. Better wages, social protection, housing, skill development, and workplace modernisation are essential
apicture Jose Vattakuzhy
22 Jun 2026
Visionary that he was, Dr APJ Abdul Kalam's ardent proposal for a National Prosperity Index to replace the National Poverty Index was an effective socio-economic mantra as a holistic formula. This per
apicture P. A. Chacko
22 Jun 2026
We are told We must not dream Of becoming: A Reader, Bent over bright margins Where new worlds germinate;
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
22 Jun 2026
Every few months, we are treated to the same political circus. A party wins an election. Voters celebrate. Defeated parties lick their wounds. Commentators analyse the verdict. Then, just when everyon
apicture Robert Clements
22 Jun 2026
After I reached this place on May 27, 1964, I have generally kept away from writing letters. Old habits, however, die hard. My daughter is here, and so are my grandsons. None of us knows you personall
apicture A. J. Philip
15 Jun 2026