Where ‘Better Life’ is a Crime

Dr Suresh Mathew Dr Suresh Mathew
12 Apr 2021

In the World Happiness Report released this past month, India stands at 139th position among 149 countries. The report, which should make us hang our heads in shame, has given better ranks for neighbouring countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh. The situation seems irredeemable going by the focus of the governments. An ignominious and dangerous example has come from Gujarat where recent legislation, the Gujarat Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Act 2021, makes offering of a “better lifestyle” leading to religious conversion a crime punishable up to seven years in jail. The original Freedom of Religion Act prohibited forcible conversion by use of force or by allurement or by fraudulent means a crime. But the amendment by the BJP government, with the addition of many draconian provisions, makes it more regressive. 

Any progressive government will have the ‘betterment of citizens’ as its focus area. A democratic government will go all-out to achieve this goal. It will not gather up the courage to make a law that goes against the betterment of people. But here is an insensitive government that has formulated a law that makes the promise of a better life to its people a crime. The amendment to the Act, if implemented in letter and spirit, will make it impossible even to offer God’s blessings to people of other religions as it is construed as luring them for conversion. If religious leaders cannot preach better life and offer God’s blessings, what else are they supposed to do? If one cannot sermonize on what would bring happiness, better life, and God’s blessings, the Constitutional provisions permitting practice and propagation of religion will remain a meaningless Article in the pages of the Statute book.

The notoriety of the amended Act becomes clear from its ambit and scope. Anyone who aids, abets, counsels, or convinces a person for religious conversion is liable to be arrested and tried under the harsh provisions of the law. This is an outright violation of the Constitutional provision of freedom of speech and expression; it also contravenes freedom of conscience and free profession, practice, and propagation of religion. Giving the Act more teeth, anyone who is even distantly related to the person who opted for conversion can file an FIR for an offence believed to have been committed under the Act. 

The amendments are an out-and-out challenge to the fundamental rights of citizens. The Act is based on the premise that people who opt for conversion are lured and trapped in the process. This makes it impossible for a person to follow a religion of one’s choice as his conversion can be interpreted as ‘luring’ one to lead a better life. For example, if a person, who is frustrated by the inhumane and appalling treatment being faced in his religion, decides to convert to a different religion, where he is convinced of leading a better life, he may find himself cooling his heels in a prison. Adding insult to injury, those who help him in the process too will be charged with a crime that is non-bailable. Doesn’t this development ring alarm bells for religious leaders of minority communities, including the Church leaders? If this ‘Gujarat model’ is replicated across the country, it will pave the path to Hindu Rastra sooner than later.  
 


 

Recent Posts

Courts speak through evidence, not the religion of judges or the accused. Once judicial decisions are judged by identity instead of reasoning, the blindfold of Lady Justice falls, and with it, public
apicture A. J. Philip
13 Jul 2026
Religion loses its soul when it becomes a vehicle for power and profit. The Ayodhya donation controversy exposes how faith is exploited for political capital and commercial enterprise. Democracy deman
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
13 Jul 2026
The deadliest weapon in modern India is invisible. Armed only with smartphones, artificial intelligence, and psychological manipulation, cybercriminals are stealing fortunes, destroying reputations, a
apicture Jaswant Kaur
13 Jul 2026
The One Nation, One Election Bill might promise slightly more efficiency, but it will damage the constitutional foundations of India's democracy. Administrative convenience cannot justify concentratin
apicture Joseph Maliakan
13 Jul 2026
When every constitutional safeguard appears compromised, the judiciary becomes democracy's last refuge. Though there have been some recent judicial interventions, they are only on the fringes and quic
apicture G Ramachandram
13 Jul 2026
Mumbai is India's financial hub. With an estimated population of 12.5 million, it is home to more billionaires than any other city in Asia. This city is renowned for its Bollywood movies, ambitious sp
apicture Fr. Anil Prakash D'Souza, OP
13 Jul 2026
A night that starts Whenever a non-Dalit Picks up a weapon Because someone Of "his" caste Was insulted By the sight Of a Mlechchha standing tall.
apicture Dr Suryaraju Mattimalla
13 Jul 2026
Democracy was never meant to end on polling day. It was meant to continue every day thereafter, with governments being questioned, ministers being challenged, and officials knowing that somebody, some
apicture Robert Clements
13 Jul 2026
Fifty years after the Emergency, the debate has shifted from suspended Democracy to whether democratic institutions can be hollowed out while elections continue and constitutional forms remain outward
apicture Thomas Menamparampil
06 Jul 2026
Is India moving forward or slipping backwards? Growing concerns over democratic institutions, civil liberties, economic inequality, and constitutional values have kept the national debate over whether
apicture Jacob Peenikaparambil
06 Jul 2026